Paper · 2003 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Uptake of fluoride by tea plant (Camellia sinensis L) and the impact of aluminium

Jianyun Ruan; Lifeng Ma; Yuanzhi Shi; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
92
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tea plant ( Camellia sinensis L) accumulates large amounts of fluoride in mature leaves from soils of normal fluoride availabilities, but the properties of fluoride absorption by this plant species are not well understood. The present study examined the characteristic of fluoride uptake by tea plants and the impact of Al with solution and soil experiments. The results showed that the fluoride taken up by tea plants was largely and readily transported, in particular to the leaves. The fluoride in leaves increased linearly with fluoride concentrations in the uptake solution ( R 2 = 0.75, P < 0.001) or in the soil ( R 2 = 0.88, P < 0.001), whereas those in root and stem were only marginally influenced. Including Al in solution or adding Al to the soil apparently increased the uptake and translocation of fluoride to the leaves. The concentrations of fluoride in the leaves were significantly ( P < 0.05) increased by 19.1% or 37.7% when 18.5 µmol l −1 Al or 74.1 µmol l −1 Al respectively was included in the uptake solution, compared with the control without Al during an uptake period of 22 h. Similarly, Al application (100 mg kg −1 ) to soil led to significantly higher fluoride concentrations in mature leaves and new shoots (one bud with three leaves). By contrast, the concentrations of Al in leaves in solution and soil experiments were not affected by fluoride and Al treatments. Nevertheless, higher Al concentrations after Al and fluoride additions were observed in the new shoots in soil experiments. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluoride taken up by tea plants was readily transported, especially to leaves.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
fluoride taken upe0

Verbatim

e0

“fluoride taken up by tea plants was largely and readily transported, in particular to the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fluoride increased linearly with uptake-solution fluoride concentration.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Compound
fluoride concentrations in the uptake solutione0
Outcome
fluoride in leavese0
Direction
increased linearlye0
Value
R 2 = 0.75e0

Verbatim

e0

“fluoride in leaves increased linearly with fluoride concentrations in the uptake solution ( R 2 = 0.75, P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fluoride increased linearly with soil fluoride concentration.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
fluoride in leavese0
Direction
increased linearlye0
Value
R 2 = 0.88e0
Setting
soile0

Verbatim

e0

“fluoride in leaves increased linearly with fluoride concentrations in the uptake solution ( R 2 = 0.75, P < 0.001) or in the soil ( R 2 = 0.88, P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and stem fluoride was only marginally influenced by fluoride availability.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Organ / stage
root and steme0
Outcome
those in root and steme0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“those in root and stem were only marginally influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al in solution increased fluoride uptake and movement to leaves.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Treatment
Including Al in solutione0
Outcome
uptake and translocation of fluoride to the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Including Al in solution or adding Al to the soil apparently increased the uptake and translocation of fluoride to the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al addition to soil increased fluoride uptake and movement to leaves.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Treatment
adding Al to the soile0
Outcome
uptake and translocation of fluoride to the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Including Al in solution or adding Al to the soil apparently increased the uptake and translocation of fluoride to the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

18.5 µmol l −1 Al increased leaf fluoride by 19.1% versus no Al over 22 h.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Treatment
18.5 µmol l −1 Ale0
Outcome
concentrations of fluoride in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.1%e0
Qualifier
22 he0
Comparator
control without Ale0

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of fluoride in the leaves were significantly ( P < 0.05) increased by 19.1% or 37.7% when 18.5 µmol l −1 Al or 74.1 µmol l −1 Al respectively was included in the uptake solution, compared with the control without Al during an uptake period of 22 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

74.1 µmol l −1 Al increased leaf fluoride by 37.7% versus no Al over 22 h.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Treatment
74.1 µmol l −1 Ale0
Outcome
concentrations of fluoride in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.7%e0
Qualifier
22 he0
Comparator
control without Ale0

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of fluoride in the leaves were significantly ( P < 0.05) increased by 19.1% or 37.7% when 18.5 µmol l −1 Al or 74.1 µmol l −1 Al respectively was included in the uptake solution, compared with the control without Al during an uptake period of 22 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Al application increased fluoride in mature leaves.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Treatment
Al application (100 mg kg −1 ) to soile0
Outcome
fluoride concentrations in mature leavese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Al application (100 mg kg −1 ) to soil led to significantly higher fluoride concentrations in mature leaves and new shoots (one bud with three leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Al application increased fluoride in new shoots.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Organ / stage
new shootse0
Treatment
Al application (100 mg kg −1 ) to soile0
Outcome
fluoride concentrations in mature leaves and new shootse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Al application (100 mg kg −1 ) to soil led to significantly higher fluoride concentrations in mature leaves and new shoots (one bud with three leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Al concentration was unaffected by fluoride and Al treatments.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Treatment
fluoride and Al treatmentse0
Outcome
concentrations of Al in leavese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of Al in leaves in solution and soil experiments were not affected by fluoride and Al treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New shoots had higher Al concentrations following soil Al and fluoride additions.

Taxon
tea plantt0
Organ / stage
new shootse0
Treatment
Al and fluoride additionse0
Outcome
Al concentrationse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher Al concentrations after Al and fluoride additions were observed in the new shoots in soil experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plant (Camellia sinensis L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–53 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · nutrient: content · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

aluminium atom · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.