Paper · 2012 · Acta Agrobotanica

The effect of different nitrogen fertilization rates on yield and quality of marigold (Calendula officinalis L. 'Tokaj') raw material

Beata Król

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) is an annual ornamental plant which is also grown for herbal raw material (flower heads) used in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. A field experiment was carried out in the years 2006-2008 in the Experimental Farm of the University of Life Sciences in Lublin. The study was conducted on loess soil with the granulometric composition of silt loam. The aim of the experiment was to determine the effect of different nitrogen rates (0, 40, 80, 120, 160 kg N × ha-1) on some morphological features of flower heads as well as on yield and quality of pot marigold raw material. Flowering of pot marigold was shortest in the control treatment (32 days) and longest (43 days) in the plot where nitrogen fertilization had been applied at the highest rate (160 kg N × ha-1). Nitrogen fertilization had a significant influence on the number of flower heads per plant, but no significant difference was found in diameter as well as in ligulate flowers and tubular flowers in the flower head. It was found to increase significantly raw material yield after the application of 80 kg N × ha-1, compared to the control treatment. Yield of flower heads did not differ markedly for fertilization rates from 80 to 160 kg N × ha-1. Nitrogen fertilization modified slightly essential oil content (this content increased with increasing nitrogen rates), but at the same time it decreased the percentage of flavonoid compounds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants flowered for 32 days, the shortest period.

Taxon
pot marigoldCalendula officinalise0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
Floweringe0
Direction
shorteste0
Value
32 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering of pot marigold was shortest in the control treatment (32 days) and longest (43 days) in the plot where nitrogen fertilization had been applied at the highest rate (160 kg N × ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 160 kg N × ha-1 rate produced the longest flowering period of 43 days.

Taxon
pot marigoldCalendula officinalise0
Treatment
160 kg N × ha-1e0
Outcome
Floweringe0
Direction
longeste0
Value
43 dayse0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering of pot marigold was shortest in the control treatment (32 days) and longest (43 days) in the plot where nitrogen fertilization had been applied at the highest rate (160 kg N × ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen significantly influenced flower-head number per plant, with direction unspecified.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
number of flower heads per plante0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization had a significant influence on the number of flower heads per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower-head diameter did not differ significantly under nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization had a significant influence on the number of flower heads per plant, but no significant difference was found in diameter as well as in ligulate flowers and tubular flowers in the flower head.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ligulate and tubular flowers did not differ significantly under nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione1
Outcome
ligulate flowers and tubular flowers in the flower heade0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference was found in diameter as well as in ligulate flowers and tubular flowers in the flower head.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen fertilization had a significant influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

80 kg N × ha-1 significantly increased raw-material yield versus control.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
80 kg N × ha-1e0
Outcome
raw material yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“It was found to increase significantly raw material yield after the application of 80 kg N × ha-1, compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower-head yield did not differ markedly from 80 to 160 kg N × ha-1.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Outcome
Yield of flower headse0
Direction
did not differ markedlye0
Qualifier
fertilization rates from 80 to 160 kg N × ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of flower heads did not differ markedly for fertilization rates from 80 to 160 kg N × ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1261 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil content increased slightly with increasing nitrogen rates.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
essential oil contente0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization modified slightly essential oil content (this content increased with increasing nitrogen rates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization decreased flavonoid compound percentage.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione1
Outcome
percentage of flavonoid compoundse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it decreased the percentage of flavonoid compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1454 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen fertilization modified slightly essential oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Tagetes (marigolds)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Tagetes (marigolds)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · growth · Tagetes (marigolds)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 44 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.