Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

RESPONSES OF GRAFTED WATERMELON ONTO DIFFERENT GOURD SPECIES TO SALINITY STRESS

Halit Yetisir; Veli Uygur

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The watermelon cultivar 'Crimson Tide' was grafted onto three different rootstocks and grown under saline conditions to investigate effects of salinity on grafted and non-grafted watermelon. One Cucurbita maxima and 2 Lagenarai siceraria landraces (Skp and Brecik) were used as rootstock. Plants were irrigated with two different saline solutions [0.5 (control) and 8.0 dS m−1] by two days interval at the first 15 days of experiment and one day interval at the last 15 days of experiment. The experimental design was randomized block. Each treatment was replicated three times with three plants. Grafted plants had higher plant growth parameter than non-grafted plant under saline conditions. Reduction in shoot dry weight was 41% in non-grafted plants while it was varied from 22% to 0.8% in grafted plants under saline conditions. Accumulation of sodium (Na+) was higher in non-grafted plants than grafted one. Calcium (Ca++) and magnesium (Mg++) concentration were higher in all grafted plants than non-grafted plants. Non-grafted plants had higher K+ concentration than other treatments under saline conditions. Ratios of Ca++/Na+, K+/Na+ and Mg++/Na+ were significantly affected by salt treatments and positively correlated with plant growth parameters. The ratios were lower in non-grafted plants than grafted plants under saline conditions. Keywords: graftingwatermelonsalinity tolerancefresh weightdry weightion regulation Notes 1Within columns, figure followed by a common letter do not differ significantly at P ≤ 0.01/P ≤ 0.05. ∗∗Significance level P ≤ 0.05, ∗∗∗significance level P ≤ 0.01. 1Within columns, figure followed by a common letter do not differ significantly at P ≤ 0.01. ∗∗∗Significance level P ≤ 0.01. 1Within columns, figure followed by a common letter do not differ significantly at P ≤ 0.01. ∗∗∗Significance level P ≤ 0.01. 1Within columns, figure followed by a common letter do not differ significantly at P ≤ 0.01. ∗∗∗Significance level P ≤ 0.01. ∗P ≤ 0.05 ∗∗P ≤ 0.01, n = 15.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted watermelon had greater growth than nongrafted watermelon under salinity.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Graftede0
Outcome
plant growth parametere0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
saline conditionse0
Comparator
non-graftede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafted plants had higher plant growth parameter than non-grafted plant under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced shoot dry weight by 41% in nongrafted plants.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Material
non-grafted plantse0
Treatment
saline conditionse1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
41%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in shoot dry weight was 41% in non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“grown under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced shoot dry weight by 22% to 0.8% in grafted plants.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Material
grafted plantse0
Treatment
saline conditionse0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
Reductione2
Value
22% to 0.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was varied from 22% to 0.8% in grafted plants under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–732 · show in text ↑
e2

“Reduction in shoot dry weight was 41% in non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–762 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulation of sodium (Na+) was higher as stated.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
Accumulation of sodium (Na+)e0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulation of sodium (Na+) was higher in non-grafted plants than grafted one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium (Ca++) and magnesium (Mg++) concentration was higher as stated.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
Calcium (Ca++) and magnesium (Mg++) concentratione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium (Ca++) and magnesium (Mg++) concentration were higher in all grafted plants than non-grafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K+ concentration was higher as stated.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
K+ concentratione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non-grafted plants had higher K+ concentration than other treatments under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ratios was lower as stated.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
ratiose0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratios were lower in non-grafted plants than grafted plants under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ion ratios were significantly affected by salt treatments.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
salt treatmentse0
Outcome
Ratios of Ca++/Na+, K+/Na+ and Mg++/Na+e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ratios of Ca++/Na+, K+/Na+ and Mg++/Na+ were significantly affected by salt treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ion ratios correlated positively with plant growth parameters.

Taxon
WATERMELONCitrullus lanatust0
Compound
Ca++/Na+, K+/Na+ and Mg++/Na+e0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ratios of Ca++/Na+, K+/Na+ and Mg++/Na+ were significantly affected by salt treatments and positively correlated with plant growth parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

salinity · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 5 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.