Paper · 1987 · Environmental Entomology

Influence of Conservation Tillage Practices on Populations of Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Rotated and Nonrotated Tomato Fields

Geoffrey W. Zehnder; James J. Linduska

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in conventional-till (CT) and no-till (NT) tomatoes in both rotated and nonrotated fields to determine effects of different cultural practices on population trends of Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). CPB were more abundant in CT than in NT plots in both rotated and nonrotated tomato fields. Earlier colonization of overwintered adults in CT plots resulted in higher egg mass densities and subsequent infestation of first-generation larvae and adults. In treatments where fenvalerate was applied to control CPB populations above economic thresholds, four spray applications were required in CT plots, compared with two applications in NT. Tomato fruit yield and soil moisture content were greater in NT than in CT plots in the rotated field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colorado potato beetle was more abundant under conventional-till than no-till in both rotated and nonrotated tomato fields.

Treatment
conventional-till (CT)e5
Interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae1pest
Outcome
CPBe0
Direction
more abundante0
Comparator
no-till (NT)e5
Setting
rotated and nonrotated fieldse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CPB were more abundant in CT than in NT plots in both rotated and nonrotated tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–353 · show in text ↑
e1

“population trends of Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–261 · show in text ↑
e5

“Field experiments were conducted in conventional-till (CT) and no-till (NT) tomatoes in both rotated and nonrotated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier colonization in conventional-till plots resulted in higher Colorado potato beetle egg mass densities.

Interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae1pest
Outcome
egg mass densitiese2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CPB were more abundant in CT than in NT plots in both rotated and nonrotated tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–353 · show in text ↑
e1

“population trends of Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–261 · show in text ↑
e2

“Earlier colonization of overwintered adults in CT plots resulted in higher egg mass densities and subsequent infestation of first-generation larvae and adults”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–513 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional-till plots required about twice as many fenvalerate spray applications as no-till plots to control Colorado potato beetle.

Treatment
fenvaleratee6
Outcome
spray applicationse3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
foure3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CPB were more abundant in CT than in NT plots in both rotated and nonrotated tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–353 · show in text ↑
e3

“four spray applications were required in CT plots, compared with two applications in NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–700 · show in text ↑
e6

“In treatments where fenvalerate was applied to control CPB populations above economic thresholds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till tomato plots in the rotated field had greater fruit yield and soil moisture content than conventional-till plots.

Treatment
no-till (NT)e5
Outcome
fruit yield and soil moisture contente4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
CT plotse4
Setting
rotated fielde4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Tomato fruit yield and soil moisture content were greater in NT than in CT plots in the rotated field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–803 · show in text ↑
e5

“Field experiments were conducted in conventional-till (CT) and no-till (NT) tomatoes in both rotated and nonrotated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑

tillage · Leptinotarsa decemlineata · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.