Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Freshness retention of minimally processed melon using different packages and multilayered edible coating containing microencapsulated essential oil

Samira Pereira Moreira; Winne Moita de Carvalho; Angeline Costa Alexandrino; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary This study evaluated the effectiveness of packaging using a microencapsulated β‐cyclodextrin and trans ‐cinnamaldehyde complex incorporated into a base chitosan matrix on the shelf life of fresh‐cut melon ( C ucumis melo L . var. R eticulatus N aud) group Inodorus that were coated with a multilayered coating system using a polypropylene tray ( Z iploc ® ) with (i) Z iploc ® lid, (ii) S aran ® wrap and (iii) plain cheesecloth and stored at 4 °C for 15 days. The multilayered antimicrobial coating improved the shelf life of fresh‐cut melon (up to 15 days), compared with the controls (7 days). Coated samples were firmer, maintained colour and total carotenoids content and showed less weight loss than the controls ( P < 0.05). Among the packaging treatments, the Z iploc ® lid was the most effective in maintaining shelf life. This study demonstrates the application of a new generation of edible coating using natural antimicrobial agents by means of the layer‐by‐layer assembly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antimicrobial coating extended fresh-cut melon shelf life to 15 days compared with 7 days in controls.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
multilayered antimicrobial coatinge0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
up to 15 dayse0
Qualifier
7 dayse0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The multilayered antimicrobial coating improved the shelf life of fresh‐cut melon (up to 15 days), compared with the controls (7 days).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated melon was firmer than controls.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Coatede0
Outcome
firmere0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coated samples were firmer, maintained colour and total carotenoids content and showed less weight loss than the controls ( P < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated melon maintained colour and total carotenoids compared with controls.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Coatede0
Outcome
colour and total carotenoids contente0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coated samples were firmer, maintained colour and total carotenoids content and showed less weight loss than the controls ( P < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated melon lost less weight than controls.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Coatede0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coated samples were firmer, maintained colour and total carotenoids content and showed less weight loss than the controls ( P < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ziploc lid was most effective among packages for retaining melon shelf life.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Z iploc ® lide0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
packaging treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the packaging treatments, the Z iploc ® lid was the most effective in maintaining shelf life.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.