Abstract
Abstract Unshelled Dixie Runner, Early Runner, and Virginia Runner G‐26 peanuts were stored 3 1/2 months at moisture contents ranging from 4.8 to 11.2% kernel dry weight. Seed were analyzed quantitatively for various components. Initial composition was determined for each variety. Changes during storage were qualitatively the same for the three varieties but quantitatively different for some components. Oil content iodine value, tocopherols, total and protein nitrogen, and total sugar content were not influenced by storage moisture. Carbonyl compounds, free fatty acids, and peroxide values varied directly as storage moisture. Early Runner and Virginia Runner G‐26 appeared less susceptible to the development of oxidative and hydrolytic rancidity than Dixie Runner. However, the degree of difference was slight and occurred only at higher storage moistures. Initial composition of the three varieties differed slightly. Early Runner had a slightly greater initial oil percentage and lower total sugar content than either Dixie or Virginia G‐26. Virginia Runner G‐26 had a slightly lower total nitrogen percentage than either of the other two varieties.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Oil content, iodine value and tocopherols of stored peanuts were not influenced by storage moisture.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- storage moisturee0
- Outcome
- Oil content iodine value, tocopherolse0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Oil content iodine value, tocopherols, total and protein nitrogen, and total sugar content were not influenced by storage moisture”
t0“runner peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Total nitrogen, protein nitrogen and total sugar content of stored peanuts were not influenced by storage moisture.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- storage moisturee0
- Outcome
- total and protein nitrogen, and total sugar contente0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Oil content iodine value, tocopherols, total and protein nitrogen, and total sugar content were not influenced by storage moisture”
t0“runner peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbonyl compounds, free fatty acids and peroxide values of stored peanuts varied directly with storage moisture.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- storage moisturee0
- Outcome
- Carbonyl compounds, free fatty acids, and peroxide valuese0
- Direction
- varied directlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Carbonyl compounds, free fatty acids, and peroxide values varied directly as storage moisture”
t0“runner peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Early Runner appeared less susceptible than Dixie Runner to the development of oxidative and hydrolytic rancidity.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Early Runnere0
- Outcome
- development of oxidative and hydrolytic ranciditye0
- Direction
- less susceptiblee0
- Comparator
- Dixie Runnere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Early Runner and Virginia Runner G‐26 appeared less susceptible to the development of oxidative and hydrolytic rancidity than Dixie Runner”
t0“runner peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Virginia Runner G-26 appeared less susceptible than Dixie Runner to the development of oxidative and hydrolytic rancidity.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Virginia Runner G‐26e0
- Outcome
- development of oxidative and hydrolytic ranciditye0
- Direction
- less susceptiblee0
- Comparator
- Dixie Runnere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Early Runner and Virginia Runner G‐26 appeared less susceptible to the development of oxidative and hydrolytic rancidity than Dixie Runner”
t0“runner peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Early Runner had a slightly greater initial oil percentage than Dixie or Virginia G-26.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Early Runnere0
- Outcome
- initial oil percentagee0
- Direction
- slightly greatere0
- Comparator
- Dixie or Virginia G‐26e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Early Runner had a slightly greater initial oil percentage and lower total sugar content than either Dixie or Virginia G‐26”
t0“runner peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Early Runner had lower initial total sugar content than Dixie or Virginia G-26.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Early Runnere0
- Outcome
- total sugar contente0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- Dixie or Virginia G‐26e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Early Runner had a slightly greater initial oil percentage and lower total sugar content than either Dixie or Virginia G‐26”
t0“runner peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Virginia Runner G-26 had a slightly lower total nitrogen percentage than Dixie Runner and Early Runner.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Virginia Runner G‐26e0
- Outcome
- total nitrogen percentagee0
- Direction
- slightly lowere0
- Comparator
- the other two varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Virginia Runner G‐26 had a slightly lower total nitrogen percentage than either of the other two varieties”
t0“runner peanuts”
The same questions in other papers
storage · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
storage · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.