Paper · 1994 · Australian Journal of Soil Research

Carbon content and bulk-density of an irrigated natrixeralf in relation to tree root growth and orchard management

WW Emerson; RC Foster; JM Tisdall; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper investigates why there are usually very few feeder roots present in the surface soil of irrigated orchards in the Goulburn Valley, as this may be reducing fruit yields. Nine orchards were selected to cover the range of soil and water management. In each orchard, when the soil was near field capacity, root proliferation and earthworm activity were noted and a core taken. Where the C content of cores was 1% or less, few roots were present, the soil was severely compacted and inter-particle bonding was weak. Root proliferation, soil porosity and clay inter-particle bonding all reached a maximum at about 2.2% C. With 3-4% C present, few roots were seen, bonding remained strong, but the soil was again compacted. It is suggested that with increasing C content, carbohydrate gel progressively bonds portions of the mineral matrix together. Eventually, probably mainly as a result of earthworm activity, the mineral matrix becomes embedded in gel. Then, although the gel itself retains about 4.6 g H2O per g of C at 10 kPa suction, none is available for root growth, because of the high penetration resistance of the soil. Root growth is also inhibited at low C contents, because of the high bulk density. Maximum root proliferation occurred in permanent banks raised around mature trees, where the banks were wetted by capillarity every 2-3 weeks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1% carbon or less, few orchard roots occurred and soil was severely compacted with weak bonding.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
few roots were presente0
Value
1% or lesse0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Where the C content of cores was 1% or less, few roots were present, the soil was severely compacted and inter-particle bonding was weak.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root proliferation, porosity and clay bonding peaked near 2.2% carbon.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
Root proliferation, soil porosity and clay inter-particle bondinge0
Direction
maximume0
Value
about 2.2% Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Root proliferation, soil porosity and clay inter-particle bonding all reached a maximum at about 2.2% C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 3–4% carbon, few roots occurred despite strong bonding, and soil was compacted.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
few roots were seene0
Value
3-4% Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“With 3-4% C present, few roots were seen, bonding remained strong, but the soil was again compacted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High soil carbon was interpreted to embed mineral matrix in gel and restrict root water access through penetration resistance.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
none is available for root growthe0
Value
4.6 g H2O per g of Ce0
Qualifier
high penetration resistance of the soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Eventually, probably mainly as a result of earthworm activity, the mineral matrix becomes embedded in gel. Then, although the gel itself retains about 4.6 g H2O per g of C at 10 kPa suction, none is available for root growth, because of the high penetration resistance of the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low carbon inhibited root growth through high bulk density.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
Root growth is also inhibitede0
Qualifier
high bulk densitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth is also inhibited at low C contents, because of the high bulk density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“tree root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent banks around mature trees wetted every 2–3 weeks had maximum root proliferation.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
permanent bankse0
Outcome
root proliferatione0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
every 2-3 weekse0

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum root proliferation occurred in permanent banks raised around mature trees, where the banks were wetted by capillarity every 2-3 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1361 · show in text ↑