Paper · 2008 · Soil Use and Management

Residual effect and nitrate leaching in grass‐arable rotations: effect of grassland proportion, sward type and fertilizer history

J. Eriksen; M. Askegaard; K. Søegaard

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
60
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A key point in designing grass‐arable rotations is to find the right balance between the number of cultivations and the length of the grass phase. In a field experiment, we investigated the effect of cropping history (grazed unfertilized grass–clover and fertilized [300 kg N per hectare] ryegrass, proportion of grassland and previous fertilizer use) on crop growth and nitrate leaching for 2 years following grassland cultivation. In the final year, the effect of perennial ryegrass as a catch crop was investigated. The nitrogen fertilizer replacement value (NFRV) of grassland cultivation was higher at 132 kg N per hectare in the rotation with 75% grassland compared with on average 111 kg N per hectare in rotations with 25 and 38% grassland and the NFRV of ryegrass in the rotation was higher than that of grass–clover. Nitrate leaching following cultivation was not affected by the proportion of grassland in the crop rotation or sward type. However, there was a considerable effect of having a ryegrass catch crop following the final barley crop as nitrate leaching was reduced from 60 to 9 kg N per hectare. When summarizing results from the crop rotations over a longer period (1997–2005), management strategy adopted in both the grassland and arable phases appeared to be the primary instrument in avoiding nutrient losses from mixed crop rotations, irrespective of grass proportion. In the arable phase, the huge potential of catch crops has been demonstrated, but it is also important to realize that all parts of the grass‐arable crop rotations must be considered potentially leaky.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of grassland cultivation was higher in the rotation with 75% grassland (132 kg N per hectare) than in rotations with 25 and 38% grassland (on average 111 kg N per hectare).

Taxon
grasslande1
Treatment
rotation with 75% grasslande1
Outcome
nitrogen fertilizer replacement value (NFRV) of grassland cultivatione1
Direction
highere1
Value
132 kg N per hectaree1
Comparator
rotations with 25 and 38% grasslande1

Verbatim

e1

“The nitrogen fertilizer replacement value (NFRV) of grassland cultivation was higher at 132 kg N per hectare in the rotation with 75% grassland compared with on average 111 kg N per hectare in rotations with 25 and 38% grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of ryegrass in the rotation was higher than that of grass-clover.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume2
Treatment
ryegrasse2
Outcome
NFRVe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
grass–clovere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the NFRV of ryegrass in the rotation was higher than that of grass–clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate leaching following cultivation was not affected by the proportion of grassland in the crop rotation.

Taxon
grasslande3
Treatment
proportion of grassland in the crop rotatione3
Outcome
Nitrate leaching following cultivatione3
Direction
not affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Nitrate leaching following cultivation was not affected by the proportion of grassland in the crop rotation or sward type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate leaching following cultivation was not affected by sward type.

Taxon
grasslande3
Treatment
sward typee3
Outcome
Nitrate leaching following cultivatione3
Direction
not affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Nitrate leaching following cultivation was not affected by the proportion of grassland in the crop rotation or sward type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A ryegrass catch crop following the final barley crop reduced nitrate leaching to 9 kg N per hectare.

Treatment
ryegrass catch crope4
Outcome
nitrate leachinge4
Direction
reducede4
Value
60 to 9 kg N per hectaree4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“there was a considerable effect of having a ryegrass catch crop following the final barley crop as nitrate leaching was reduced from 60 to 9 kg N per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1125 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Management strategy in the grassland and arable phases appeared to be the primary instrument in avoiding nutrient losses from mixed crop rotations, irrespective of grass proportion.

Taxon
grasslande5
Treatment
management strategy adopted in both the grassland and arable phasese5
Outcome
avoiding nutrient lossese5
Qualifier
irrespective of grass proportione5

Verbatim

e5

“management strategy adopted in both the grassland and arable phases appeared to be the primary instrument in avoiding nutrient losses from mixed crop rotations, irrespective of grass proportion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1403 · show in text ↑

cover crop · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.