Paper · 1984 · Agronomy Journal

Snap Bean Plant Responses to Nitrogen Fertilization1

N. H. Peck; G. E. MacDonald

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen fertilization may affect vegetative growth as well as yield and quality of pods of snap bean [ Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) var. humilis ] plants. A study was conducted to determine the effect of N fertilization on vegetative growth, N partitioning in the plants and production of pods on snap bean plants. Snap bean plants, Bush Blue Lake‐47, were grown under field conditions with N from ammonium nitrate at rates of 0, 4, 8, and 12 g m −2 placed in a band 5 cm to the side and 5 cm below the depth of the seeds at planting time on 10 June 1981 in a Lima silt loam (fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic Glossoboric Hapludalf), a productive soil derived from calcareous glacial till. Rows were 50 cm apart with 22 productive plants m −1 of row (44 plants m −2 ). The fresh weight, dry weight, total N and nitrate N were determined in different parts of the plants at the seedling, bloom, and pod stages. Yield and quality determinations were made on the pods at 10 and 13 August harvests. Fertilizer N decreased growth of the plants in the seedling stage but not by the pod stage. Fertilizer N reduced the number of rhizobium nodules on the roots. At the pod stage, total N was 15.7 g m −2 in plants grown with residual available soil N but without fertilizer N, while total N was 19.5 g m −2 in plants grown with residual soil N plus fertilizer N at 12 g m −2 . Fertilizer N at 4 to 8 g m −2 produced the optimum quality and yield of snap bean pods for processing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen decreased seedling stage growth.

Taxon
snap beant0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Treatment
Fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
growth of the plantse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N decreased growth of the plants in the seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen did not decrease growth by the pod stage.

Taxon
snap beant0
Organ / stage
pod stagee0
Treatment
Fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
growth of the plantse0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N decreased growth of the plants in the seedling stage but not by the pod stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen reduced rhizobium nodule number on roots.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
Fertilizer Ne0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
number of rhizobium nodules on the rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N reduced the number of rhizobium nodules on the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the pod stage, total plant nitrogen was 15.7 g m −2 without fertilizer nitrogen.

Taxon
snap beant0
Organ / stage
pod stagee0
Outcome
total Ne0
Value
15.7 g m −2e0
Qualifier
without fertilizer Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“At the pod stage, total N was 15.7 g m −2 in plants grown with residual available soil N but without fertilizer N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the pod stage, total plant nitrogen was 19.5 g m −2 with fertilizer nitrogen at 12 g m −2.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
fertilizer N at 12 g m −2e0
Outcome
total Ne0
Value
19.5 g m −2e0

Verbatim

e0

“total N was 19.5 g m −2 in plants grown with residual soil N plus fertilizer N at 12 g m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen at 4 to 8 g m −2 produced optimal snap bean pod quality and yield for processing.

Taxon
snap beane0
Organ / stage
podse0
Treatment
Fertilizer N at 4 to 8 g m −2e0
Outcome
quality and yield of snap bean podse0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N at 4 to 8 g m −2 produced the optimum quality and yield of snap bean pods for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1466 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Rhizobium · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 121 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 121 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.