Paper · 2006 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

The interactions between nitrogen dose, year and stage of ripeness on nitrogen and trace element concentrations and seed‐borne pathogens in organic and conventional wheat

Gärd L‐Baeckström; Bengt Lundegårdh; Ulf Hanell

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of N dose and stage of ripeness on Fe, Co, Cr, Ni, Se and N concentration and incidence of fungal diseases were measured in winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems on neighbouring areas of a 10‐year‐old manure‐based farm. Principal components analysis (PCA) of the data showed that year had the greatest influence on the results, but that cropping system affected N, Ni, Fe and Se content and incidence of diseases. Attack by Dreschlera tritici‐repentis was highest in ORG and attack by Stagonospora nodorum in CONV. Increasing stage of maturity increased incidence of fungal disease and Fe content. Analysis of variance and MANOVA showed that wheat yield was affected by weather (precipitation and temperature), cropping system and N dose. The 10% lower yield in ORG than CONV was explained by a lower amount of plant available N at the same N dose. Nitrogen, Fe, Ni, Se and Co contents in grain were affected by year, while dry matter content was significantly lower in ORG than in CONV. The MANOVA identified correlations between Co and Fe, Ni and Se. Incidence of fungal diseases was foremost affected by weather, stage of ripeness and N dose. Organic cropping increased Fe and Se uptake and decreased S. nodorum attack, but increased attack by D. tritici‐repentis . Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year had the greatest influence on the results of the principal components analysis in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
yeare1
Outcome
the resultse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“year had the greatest influence on the results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–379 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system affected N, Ni, Fe and Se content in winter wheat grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
cropping systeme2
Outcome
N, Ni, Fe and Se contente2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e2

“cropping system affected N, Ni, Fe and Se content and incidence of diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–465 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system affected the incidence of fungal diseases in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
cropping systeme2
Outcome
incidence of diseasese2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e2

“cropping system affected N, Ni, Fe and Se content and incidence of diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–465 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Attack by Dreschlera tritici‐repentis was highest in organic (ORG) winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
ORGe3
Interactor
Dreschlera tritici‐repentise3pathogen
Outcome
attacke3
Direction
higheste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e3

“Attack by Dreschlera tritici‐repentis was highest in ORG and attack by Stagonospora nodorum in CONV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–566 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Attack by Stagonospora nodorum was higher in conventional (CONV) winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
CONVe3
Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume3pathogen
Outcome
attacke3
Direction
higherinferrede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e3

“Attack by Dreschlera tritici‐repentis was highest in ORG and attack by Stagonospora nodorum in CONV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic cropping increased Fe and Se uptake in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Organic croppinge4
Outcome
Fe and Se uptakee4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e4

“Organic cropping increased Fe and Se uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing stage of maturity increased the incidence of fungal disease in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Increasing stage of maturitye5
Outcome
incidence of fungal diseasee5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing stage of maturity increased incidence of fungal disease and Fe content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing stage of maturity increased Fe content in winter wheat grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Increasing stage of maturitye5
Outcome
Fe contente5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing stage of maturity increased incidence of fungal disease and Fe content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–649 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weather (precipitation and temperature) affected winter wheat yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
weather (precipitation and temperature)e6
Outcome
wheat yielde6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e6

“wheat yield was affected by weather (precipitation and temperature), cropping system and N dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–790 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system affected winter wheat yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
cropping systeme6
Outcome
wheat yielde6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e6

“wheat yield was affected by weather (precipitation and temperature), cropping system and N dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–790 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N dose affected winter wheat yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N dosee6
Outcome
wheat yielde6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e6

“wheat yield was affected by weather (precipitation and temperature), cropping system and N dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield in ORG was 10% lower than in CONV.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
ORGe7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
lowere7
Value
10%e7
Comparator
CONVe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e7

“The 10% lower yield in ORG than CONV was explained by a lower amount of plant available N at the same N dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–900 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The lower yield in ORG winter wheat is explained by a lower amount of plant-available N at the same N dose.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
yielde7
Qualifier
a lower amount of plant available Ne7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e7

“The 10% lower yield in ORG than CONV was explained by a lower amount of plant available N at the same N dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–900 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen, Fe and Ni contents in winter wheat grain were affected by year.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
yeare1
Outcome
Nitrogen, Fe, Nie1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen, Fe, Ni, Se and Co contents in grain were affected by year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–969 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Se and Co contents in winter wheat grain were affected by year.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
yeare1
Outcome
Se and Co contentse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen, Fe, Ni, Se and Co contents in grain were affected by year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter content of winter wheat grain was significantly lower in ORG than in CONV.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
ORGe2
Outcome
dry matter contente2
Direction
significantly lowere2
Comparator
CONVe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e2

“while dry matter content was significantly lower in ORG than in CONV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1039 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co was correlated with Fe, and Ni with Se, in winter wheat grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Compound
Co and Fee3
Outcome
correlationse3
Qualifier
between Co and Fe, Ni and See3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e3

“The MANOVA identified correlations between Co and Fe, Ni and Se”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1104 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incidence of fungal diseases in winter wheat was foremost affected by weather, stage of ripeness and N dose.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
weather, stage of ripeness and N dosee4
Outcome
Incidence of fungal diseasese4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain from conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–214 · show in text ↑
e4

“Incidence of fungal diseases was foremost affected by weather, stage of ripeness and N dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1197 · show in text ↑

stage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 71 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.