Paper · 2005 · Agronomy Journal

Early‐Season Defoliation Effects on TopCross High‐Oil Corn Production

T. F. Mangen; P. R. Thomison; S. D. Strachan

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

High‐oil corn ( Zea mays L.) produced with the TopCross grain production system is planted as a physical mixture (a TC Blend) containing 91% high‐yielding, male‐sterile hybrid (grain parent) seed and 9% pollinator seed. Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Ohio in 1999 and 2000 to determine if high‐oil corn (HOC) TC Blends are more sensitive to defoliation damage than their normal‐oil corn (NOC) hybrid counterparts consisting of 100% male‐fertile plants. Corn plants were 100% defoliated at V5 and 50 and 100% defoliated at V13. Defoliation similarly affected grain yield and oil concentration of HOC TC Blends and NOC hybrids. Complete defoliation at V13, averaged across years and hybrids, was the most damaging defoliation treatment, reducing grain yields 29%. Defoliation did not significantly alter grain oil concentration of HOC grain parents (74.5 g kg −1 ) or NOC (34.5 g kg −1 ). Defoliation caused similar responses in ear weights and oil concentrations in both components (the pollinator and the grain parent) of the HOC TC Blends. The lack of hybrid × defoliation interactions for ear yield components and various agronomic traits indicates that HOC TC Blends and their respective NOC counterparts responded similarly to early‐season defoliation over a range of environmental conditions. Guidelines for assessing early‐season leaf injury in conventional corn may be suitable for assessing leaf injury in HOC TC Blends.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation similarly affected grain yield and oil concentration of high-oil TC Blends and normal-oil hybrids in Ohio.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Material
HOC TC Blendse1
Treatment
Defoliatione1
Outcome
grain yield and oil concentratione1
Comparator
NOC hybridse1
Setting
Ohioe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“Defoliation similarly affected grain yield and oil concentration of HOC TC Blends and NOC hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–646 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Ohio in 1999 and 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete defoliation at V13 reduced grain yields by 29% in Ohio field experiments.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
Complete defoliation at V13e3
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
29%e3
Setting
Ohioe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Ohio in 1999 and 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–294 · show in text ↑
e3

“Complete defoliation at V13, averaged across years and hybrids, was the most damaging defoliation treatment, reducing grain yields 29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation did not significantly alter grain oil concentration of high-oil grain parents in Ohio.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Material
HOC grain parentse4
Treatment
Defoliatione4
Outcome
grain oil concentratione4
Setting
Ohioe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Ohio in 1999 and 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–294 · show in text ↑
e4

“Defoliation did not significantly alter grain oil concentration of HOC grain parents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation caused similar responses in ear weights and oil concentrations of both components of high-oil TC Blends.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Material
HOC TC Blendse5
Organ / stage
eare5
Treatment
Defoliatione5
Outcome
ear weights and oil concentrationse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e5

“Defoliation caused similar responses in ear weights and oil concentrations in both components (the pollinator and the grain parent) of the HOC TC Blends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1061 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Guidelines for assessing early-season leaf injury in conventional corn may be suitable for assessing leaf injury in high-oil TC Blends.

Taxon
conventional corne7
Outcome
Guidelines for assessing early‐season leaf injurye7

Verbatim

e0

“Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e7

“Guidelines for assessing early‐season leaf injury in conventional corn may be suitable for assessing leaf injury in HOC TC Blends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-oil TC Blends and their NOC counterparts responded similarly to early-season defoliation.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Material
HOC TC Blendse6
Treatment
early‐season defoliatione6
Outcome
responded similarlye6
Comparator
their respective NOC counterpartse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e6

“HOC TC Blends and their respective NOC counterparts responded similarly to early‐season defoliation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1277 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: oil · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

pruning · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 86 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.