Paper · 1976 · Agronomy Journal

Alfalfa Weevil Effects on Root Reserves, Development Rate, and Canopy Structure of Alfalfa1

Gary W. Fick; Beverly W. Y. Liu

9
claims
26
verbatim quotes
21
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Defoliation by the alfalfa weevil ( Hypera postica Gyllenhal) results in a direct reduction in yield of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.). Indirect responses to insect feeding may partially compensate for direct losses or cause further reductions in yield and feed quality. The purpose of this study was to identify indirect responses of alfalfa to weevil defoliation. We studied the effects of the alfalfa weevil on (i) root reserves, as measured by total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC) in the taproot, (ii) morphological rate of development, and (iii) canopy structure. Alfalfa weevil defoliation produced statistically significant effects on all three factors. When the peak of the undisturbed larval population was about three/stem, TNC levels were reduced by up to 0.14 metric ton/ha while defoliation occurred. After the larval population declined, there was recovery growth and TNC yields reached levels up to 0.09 metric ton/ha higher than where weevils were controlled. The crossover from lower to higher TNC levels was associated with delayed morphological development and a prolonged TNC accumulation period where damage occurred. When alfalfa was cut before the larval population reached a peak, TNC levels were reduced during the regrowth period. Larval populations higher than two/stem reduced canopy height and leaf percentages during defoliation. During the post‐defoliation recovery period, moderately damaged plants increased in leaf percentage and produced more branches than lightly defoliated plants. However, the moderately defoliated plants remained shorter and there were resulting large differences in canopy structure. These findings showed a wide range of indirect effects of insect defoliation on alfalfa growth, and they should be considered in evaluating insect damage to the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weevil defoliation reduced alfalfa root TNC by up to 0.14 metric ton/ha during feeding.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
defoliatione2
Interactor
alfalfa weevilHypera posticae0pest
Outcome
TNC levelse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
0.14 metric ton/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Hypera postica
Hypera postica · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa weevil ( Hypera postica Gyllenhal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“TNC levels were reduced by up to 0.14 metric ton/ha while defoliation occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After larval decline, TNC yields rose up to 0.09 metric ton/ha above weevil-controlled plots.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
larval populatione2
Interactor
alfalfa weevilHypera posticae0pest
Outcome
TNC yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Value
0.09 metric ton/hae2
Comparator
where weevils were controllede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Hypera postica
Hypera postica · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa weevil ( Hypera postica Gyllenhal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“After the larval population declined, there was recovery growth and TNC yields reached levels up to 0.09 metric ton/ha higher than where weevils were controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–986 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The TNC crossover was associated with delayed development and longer accumulation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
morphological developmente1
Outcome
crossover from lower to higher TNC levelse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“The crossover from lower to higher TNC levels was associated with delayed morphological development and a prolonged TNC accumulation period where damage occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting before peak larvae reduced TNC during regrowth.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
cut before the larval population reached a peake2
Interactor
alfalfa weevilHypera posticae1pest
Outcome
TNC levelse2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Hypera postica
Hypera postica · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa weevil ( Hypera postica Gyllenhal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“When alfalfa was cut before the larval population reached a peak, TNC levels were reduced during the regrowth period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than two larvae per stem reduced canopy height.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Larval populations higher than two/steme2
Interactor
alfalfa weevilHypera posticae1pest
Outcome
canopy heighte2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Hypera postica
Hypera postica · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa weevil ( Hypera postica Gyllenhal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“Larval populations higher than two/stem reduced canopy height and leaf percentages during defoliation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than two larvae per stem reduced leaf percentages.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Larval populations higher than two/steme2
Interactor
alfalfa weevilHypera posticae1pest
Outcome
leaf percentagese2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Hypera postica
Hypera postica · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa weevil ( Hypera postica Gyllenhal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“Larval populations higher than two/stem reduced canopy height and leaf percentages during defoliation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderately damaged plants increased leaf percentage during recovery.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
moderately damaged plantse2
Interactor
alfalfa weevilHypera posticae1pest
Outcome
leaf percentagee2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
lightly defoliated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Hypera postica
Hypera postica · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa weevil ( Hypera postica Gyllenhal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“During the post‐defoliation recovery period, moderately damaged plants increased in leaf percentage and produced more branches than lightly defoliated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderately damaged plants produced more branches than lightly defoliated plants.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
moderately damaged plantse2
Interactor
alfalfa weevilHypera posticae1pest
Outcome
branchese2
Direction
moree2
Comparator
lightly defoliated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Hypera postica
Hypera postica · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa weevil ( Hypera postica Gyllenhal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“moderately damaged plants increased in leaf percentage and produced more branches than lightly defoliated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderately damaged plants remained shorter.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
moderately defoliated plantse2
Interactor
alfalfa weevilHypera posticae1pest
Outcome
shortere2
Direction
shortere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Hypera postica
Hypera postica · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–142 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa weevil ( Hypera postica Gyllenhal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“the moderately defoliated plants remained shorter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1588 · show in text ↑

pruning · Hypera postica · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.