Paper · 2012 · Soil Use and Management

Catch crop biomass production, nitrogen uptake and root development under different tillage systems

L. J. Munkholm; E. M. Hansen

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Catch crops are generally regarded as an efficient tool to reduce nitrate leaching. However, the benefits need to be balanced against potential adverse effects on the main crop yields. The objectives of the study were to study three contrasting catch crops, that is, dyer's woad ( DW ) ( I satis tinctoria L .), perennial ryegrass ( RG ) ( L olium perenne L .) and fodder radish ( FR ) ( R aphanus sativus L .) under three tillage systems. For that, we used a tillage experiment established in 2002 on a Danish sandy loam. The tillage treatments were direct drilling ( D ), harrowing to 8–10 cm ( H ) and ploughing ( P ). Above‐ground biomass production and N uptake were measured in the catch crops and the main crop. Catch crop root growth was studied using both minirhizotron and core methods. Soil penetration resistance was recorded to 60 cm depth. Fodder radish and RG produced up to 1800 kg/ha dry matter and DW 900 kg/ha. The nitrogen uptake in November was 55, 37 and 31 kg N/ha for FR , RG and DW , respectively, when averaged across the 2 yr of study. The yield of the spring barley main crop was in general highest where FR was grown as a catch crop. Ploughing tended to result in highest yields although differences were only significant in 2008. The minirhizotron root measurements showed that the crucifers FR and DW achieved better subsoil rooting than RG . In contrast, the soil core data showed no significant difference between FR and RG in subsoil root growth. Our study highlights the need for further studies on subsoil root growth of different catch crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder radish produced up to 1800 kg/ha dry matter.

Taxon
Fodder radishe0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Value
up to 1800 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Fodder radish and RG produced up to 1800 kg/ha dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–920 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perennial ryegrass produced up to 1800 kg/ha dry matter.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Outcome
dry mattere0
Value
up to 1800 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fodder radish and RG produced up to 1800 kg/ha dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass ( RG )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–346 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dyer's woad produced 900 kg/ha dry matter.

Taxon
dyer's woade1
Outcome
DWe0
Value
900 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“DW 900 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–938 · show in text ↑
e1

“dyer's woad ( DW )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–294 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder radish took up 55 kg N/ha in November, averaged over two years.

Taxon
fodder radishe1
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Value
55e0
Qualifier
Novembere0

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen uptake in November was 55, 37 and 31 kg N/ha for FR , RG and DW , respectively, when averaged across the 2 yr of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“fodder radish ( FR )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–394 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perennial ryegrass took up 37 kg N/ha in November, averaged over two years.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Value
37e0
Qualifier
Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen uptake in November was 55, 37 and 31 kg N/ha for FR , RG and DW , respectively, when averaged across the 2 yr of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass ( RG )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–346 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dyer's woad took up 31 kg N/ha in November, averaged over two years.

Taxon
dyer's woade1
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Value
31 kg N/hae0
Qualifier
Novembere0

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen uptake in November was 55, 37 and 31 kg N/ha for FR , RG and DW , respectively, when averaged across the 2 yr of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“dyer's woad ( DW )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–294 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring barley yield was generally highest after fodder radish.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
FRe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of the spring barley main crop was in general highest where FR was grown as a catch crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“fodder radish ( FR )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing tended to give the highest yields, with significant differences only in 2008.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
Ploughinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
only significant in 2008e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ploughing tended to result in highest yields although differences were only significant in 2008.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley main crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minirhizotron measurements found better subsoil rooting for fodder radish than perennial ryegrass.

Taxon
fodder radishe1
Outcome
subsoil rootinge0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
RGe0

Verbatim

e0

“The minirhizotron root measurements showed that the crucifers FR and DW achieved better subsoil rooting than RG .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1382 · show in text ↑
e1

“fodder radish ( FR )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–394 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minirhizotron measurements found better subsoil rooting for dyer's woad than perennial ryegrass.

Taxon
dyer's woade1
Outcome
subsoil rootinge0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
RGe0

Verbatim

e0

“The minirhizotron root measurements showed that the crucifers FR and DW achieved better subsoil rooting than RG .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1382 · show in text ↑
e1

“dyer's woad ( DW )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–294 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil core data found no significant subsoil root growth difference between fodder radish and perennial ryegrass.

Taxon
fodder radishe1
Outcome
subsoil root growthe0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
RGe0

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, the soil core data showed no significant difference between FR and RG in subsoil root growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1489 · show in text ↑
e1

“fodder radish ( FR )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–394 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.