Paper · 2004 · Physiologia Plantarum

Lignification and structural biomass production in tobacco with suppressed caffeic/5‐hydroxy ferulic acid‐O‐methyl transferase activity under ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations

Lothar Blaschke; Michel Legrand; Carsten Mai; et al.

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between growth, biomass partitioning and lignification we used tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in which O-methyl transferase (OMT) activity, an enzyme involved in the pathway of sinapyl alcohol formation for lignin synthesis, was suppressed by antisense transformation. To modulate growth, controls and transformed tobacco plants were grown under ambient (approximately 380 p.p.m) or elevated CO(2) (700 p.p.m), respectively. Lignin concentrations and composition were determined with spectrophotometric methods (thioglycolate and acetyl bromide) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, respectively. A comparison of the thioglycolate and acetylbromide method suggested that the thioglycolate method was sensitive to changes in the syringyl/guaiacyl (S/G)-ratio in lignin and therefore not suitable for quantification in tissues with altered lignin composition. Growth under elevated CO(2) increased leaf and stem biomass of both genotypes by 40 and 20%, respectively, compared with ambient CO(2) and had no effect on root biomass. OMT suppression did not affect lignin concentrations in the leaves but caused a shift in biomass partitioning from the structural to the non-structural fraction. Elevated CO(2) caused a shift towards production of structural compounds resulting in decreased foliar lignin concentrations and indicating that the lignin/structural mass ratio is flexible in leaves. By contrast, the lignin concentrations of stems were unaffected by elevated CO(2) or OMT suppression and increased about three-fold from the apex to the base. Antisense-OMT plants produced more stem biomass than controls but showed no changes of the relative partitioning of biomass to the different pools. This indicates that the metabolic control of carbon fluxes to the production of structural versus non-structural fractions is tighter in stems than in leaves. FTIR spectroscopy indicated a relative increase in guaiacyl- as compared with syringyl-units in antisense-OMT tobacco, which was more pronounced under elevated as compared with ambient CO(2). Since there was no evidence for decreased lignin concentrations in the antisense-OMT plants but increased biomass formation we suggest that less methylated lignins are 'cheaper' in biosynthetic carbon and energy demand and, thus, may enable plants to allocate increased resources to growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The thioglycolate method was sensitive to changes in lignin S/G ratio and unsuitable for altered lignin composition.

Outcome
quantificatione0
Qualifier
altered lignin compositione0
Comparator
acetylbromide methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the thioglycolate method was sensitive to changes in the syringyl/guaiacyl (S/G)-ratio in lignin and therefore not suitable for quantification in tissues with altered lignin composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“thioglycolate and acetylbromide method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased leaf biomass by 40% compared with ambient CO2.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
leaf and stem biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40e0
Comparator
ambient CO(2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth under elevated CO(2) increased leaf and stem biomass of both genotypes by 40 and 20%, respectively, compared with ambient CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased stem biomass by 20% compared with ambient CO2.

Organ / stage
steme0
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
stem biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
ambient CO(2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth under elevated CO(2) increased leaf and stem biomass of both genotypes by 40 and 20%, respectively, compared with ambient CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no effect on root biomass.

Treatment
elevated CO(2)e1
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no effect on root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth under elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OMT suppression did not affect leaf lignin concentrations.

Treatment
OMT suppressione0
Gene
OMTe0
Outcome
lignin concentrations in the leavese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OMT suppression did not affect lignin concentrations in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OMT suppression shifted biomass from structural to non-structural fraction.

Treatment
OMT suppressione0
Gene
OMTe0
Outcome
biomass partitioninge0
Direction
shifte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OMT suppression did not affect lignin concentrations in the leaves but caused a shift in biomass partitioning from the structural to the non-structural fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 shifted production toward structural compounds.

Treatment
Elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
production of structural compoundse0
Direction
shifte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO(2) caused a shift towards production of structural compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased foliar lignin concentrations.

Treatment
Elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
foliar lignin concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO(2) caused a shift towards production of structural compounds resulting in decreased foliar lignin concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem lignin concentrations were unaffected by elevated CO2.

Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
lignin concentrations of stemse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lignin concentrations of stems were unaffected by elevated CO(2) or OMT suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem lignin concentrations were unaffected by OMT suppression.

Treatment
OMT suppressione0
Outcome
lignin concentrations of stemse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lignin concentrations of stems were unaffected by elevated CO(2) or OMT suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem lignin concentrations increased about three-fold from apex to base.

Organ / stage
stemse1
Outcome
lignin concentrations of stemse1
Direction
increasede0
Value
three-folde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased about three-fold from the apex to the base”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“lignin concentrations of stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antisense-OMT plants produced more stem biomass than controls.

Treatment
Antisense-OMTe0
Gene
OMTe0
Outcome
stem biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antisense-OMT plants produced more stem biomass than controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1655 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antisense-OMT plants had no change in relative biomass partitioning.

Treatment
Antisense-OMTe0
Gene
OMTe0
Outcome
relative partitioning of biomasse0
Direction
no changese0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antisense-OMT plants produced more stem biomass than controls but showed no changes of the relative partitioning of biomass to the different pools”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1740 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antisense-OMT tobacco had relatively more guaiacyl than syringyl units, especially under elevated CO2.

Treatment
antisense-OMTe0
Gene
OMTe0
Outcome
guaiacyl-e0
Direction
relative increasee0
Qualifier
more pronounced under elevated as compared with ambient CO(2)e0
Comparator
syringyl-unitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a relative increase in guaiacyl- as compared with syringyl-units in antisense-OMT tobacco, which was more pronounced under elevated as compared with ambient CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2091 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less methylated lignin may require less carbon and energy and enable increased growth.

Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
'cheaper' in biosynthetic carbon and energy demande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less methylated lignins are 'cheaper' in biosynthetic carbon and energy demand and, thus, may enable plants to allocate increased resources to growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2233–2382 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

co2 · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

loss of function · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 5 positive, 34 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.