Paper · 2011 · Genetika

Germination energy as a parameter of seed quality in different sunflower genotypes

Jelena Mrdja; Jovan Crnobarac; Nenad Dusanic; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines) developed at the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops in Novi Sad. The seed was treated with the fungicides benomil, metalaxyl and fludioxonil and the insecticides thiamethoxam and imidacloprid and kept for a year in a storage facility. Analysis of variance showed that there were highly significant differences among the genotypes, chemical treatments, and storage periods. Highly significant differences were also recorded for all the interactions among the factors studied. On average, the highest germination energy was found in the hybrid H2 (93.45%), whose values of this parameter were highly significantly higher than those of the rest of the genotypes, except for the hybrid H1. Also, each of the hybrids had highly significantly higher germination energy than either of the two lines, and the differences among the hybrids themselves were highly significant. Looking at the chemical treatments, the control had the highest germination energy by a highly significant margin (80.39%). The largest difference was observed in relation to the treatments with insecticides (5.48 and 9.56%). These treatments had highly significantly lower values of germination energy than those involving fungicides. Germination energy increased in the first nine months of storage, peaking at 81.29%. After that, there was a sharp drop to 68.94% after 12 months of storing. Differences among the different storage periods were all highly significant except for that between six and nine months of storage, which was not statistically significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid H2 had the highest germination energy on average (93.45%), higher than the other genotypes except hybrid H1.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
hybrid H2e2
Outcome
germination energye0
Direction
higheste2
Value
93.45%e2
Comparator
the rest of the genotypese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e2

“On average, the highest germination energy was found in the hybrid H2 (93.45%), whose values of this parameter were highly significantly higher than those of the rest of the genotypes, except for the hybrid H1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–861 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids had higher germination energy than either of the two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
hybridse3
Outcome
germination energye3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
either of the two linese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e3

“Also, each of the hybrids had highly significantly higher germination energy than either of the two lines, and the differences among the hybrids themselves were highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination energy differed highly significantly among the hybrids themselves.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
hybridse3
Outcome
germination energye3
Qualifier
the differences among the hybrids themselves were highly significante3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e3

“Also, each of the hybrids had highly significantly higher germination energy than either of the two lines, and the differences among the hybrids themselves were highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with insecticides lowered germination energy relative to treatments with fungicides, the largest difference being 5.48 and 9.56%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
the treatments with insecticidese5
Outcome
germination energye4
Direction
lowere4
Value
5.48 and 9.56%e5
Comparator
those involving fungicidese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e4

“These treatments had highly significantly lower values of germination energy than those involving fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1378 · show in text ↑
e5

“The largest difference was observed in relation to the treatments with insecticides (5.48 and 9.56%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The untreated control had the highest germination energy compared with the chemical treatments (80.39%).

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
chemical treatmentse6
Outcome
germination energye0
Direction
higheste6
Value
80.39%e6
Comparator
the controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e6

“Looking at the chemical treatments, the control had the highest germination energy by a highly significant margin (80.39%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination energy increased during the first nine months of storage, peaking at 81.29%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
storagee7
Outcome
germination energye7
Direction
increasede7
Value
81.29%e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e7

“Germination energy increased in the first nine months of storage, peaking at 81.29%. After that, there was a sharp drop to 68.94% after 12 months of storing. Differences among the different storage periods were all highly significant except for that between six and nine months of storage, which was not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1709 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination energy dropped sharply to 68.94% after 12 months of storage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
12 months of storinge7
Outcome
germination energye0
Direction
drope7
Value
68.94%e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e7

“Germination energy increased in the first nine months of storage, peaking at 81.29%. After that, there was a sharp drop to 68.94% after 12 months of storing. Differences among the different storage periods were all highly significant except for that between six and nine months of storage, which was not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1709 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences in germination energy among genotypes, chemical treatments and storage periods.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
germination energye0
Qualifier
highly significant differences among the genotypes, chemical treatments, and storage periodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Analysis of variance showed that there were highly significant differences among the genotypes, chemical treatments, and storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–548 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All interactions among the studied factors had highly significant effects on germination energy.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
germination energye0
Qualifier
all the interactions among the factors studiede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Analysis of variance showed that there were highly significant differences among the genotypes, chemical treatments, and storage periods. Highly significant differences were also recorded for all the interactions among the factors studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–650 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination energy did not differ significantly between six and nine months of storage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
storage periodse7
Outcome
germination energye0
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Comparator
between six and nine months of storagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the standard method, we studied the germination energy of seed of seven different sunflower genotypes (five hybrids and two cytoplasmically male sterile female lines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e7

“Germination energy increased in the first nine months of storage, peaking at 81.29%. After that, there was a sharp drop to 68.94% after 12 months of storing. Differences among the different storage periods were all highly significant except for that between six and nine months of storage, which was not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1709 · show in text ↑

insecticide · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.