Paper · 2000 · Plant Breeding

Regeneration of fertile doubled haploid plants from colchicine‐supplemented media in wheat anther culture

I. Zamani; G. Kovács; E. Gouli‐Vavdinoudi; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of colchicine added to induction medium for the production of fertile doubled haploid plants after in‐vitro anther culture was studied in wheat, Triticum aestivum L. For this, one winter and two spring wheat varieties were used. Anther cultures of the three genotypes were treated with 0.03% colchicine for 3 days at the beginning of microspore induction. Colchicine had no significant effect on anther response and embryoid production of the genotypes examined. However, in the winter wheat genotype ‘Mv Szigma’, colchicine caused a significant reduction in microspore‐derived structures. A significant decrease was also observed in plant regeneration ability of two genotypes (‘Vergina’ and ‘Acheloos’) after colchicine treatment. In addition, a significant reduction of the albinos produced was observed in all genotypes after olchicine treatment. In contrast, the regenerants obtained from the colchicine‐supplemented induction media produced significantly higher percentages of fertile plants in all genotypes. However, the level of fertility, was significantly different among the fertile plants obtained. This, together with the observation that in the case of the winter wheat variety the colchicine treatment resulted in 100% completely fertile plants with a high seed‐setting ability indicate that there is space for further improvement of the method when it is applied to spring cultivars. Finally, the increased number of seeds per 100 plated anthers obtained from all three genotypes after colchicine treatment, clearly demonstrates that the addition of colchicine to induction medium was superior to the conventional anther culture method and it could therefore be introduced into wheat breeding programmes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Colchicine did not significantly affect anther response or embryoid production across the examined genotypes.

Treatment
Colchicinee0
Outcome
anther response and embryoid productione0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colchicine had no significant effect on anther response and embryoid production of the genotypes examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–481 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in wheat, Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Colchicine significantly reduced microspore-derived structures in Mv Szigma.

Material
Mv Szigmae0
Treatment
colchicinee0
Outcome
microspore‐derived structurese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the winter wheat genotype ‘Mv Szigma’, colchicine caused a significant reduction in microspore‐derived structures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Colchicine significantly decreased plant regeneration ability in Vergina and Acheloos.

Material
‘Vergina’ and ‘Acheloos’e0
Treatment
colchicinee0
Outcome
plant regeneration abilitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease was also observed in plant regeneration ability of two genotypes (‘Vergina’ and ‘Acheloos’) after colchicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in wheat, Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Colchicine significantly reduced albino production in all genotypes.

Treatment
olchicine treatmente0
Outcome
albinos producede0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant reduction of the albinos produced was observed in all genotypes after olchicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in wheat, Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerants from colchicine-supplemented medium had significantly higher fertile-plant percentages.

Treatment
colchicine‐supplemented induction mediae0
Outcome
percentages of fertile plantse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the regenerants obtained from the colchicine‐supplemented induction media produced significantly higher percentages of fertile plants in all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in wheat, Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–185 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertility level differed significantly among fertile plants.

Outcome
level of fertilitye0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the level of fertility, was significantly different among the fertile plants obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in wheat, Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colchicine treatment gave the winter wheat variety 100% completely fertile plants with high seed setting.

Material
winter wheat varietye0
Treatment
colchicine treatmente0
Outcome
completely fertile plantse0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the case of the winter wheat variety the colchicine treatment resulted in 100% completely fertile plants with a high seed‐setting ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1313 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied in wheat, Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colchicine increased seeds per 100 plated anthers in all three genotypes over conventional culture.

Treatment
colchicine treatmente0
Outcome
number of seeds per 100 plated antherse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional anther culture methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased number of seeds per 100 plated anthers obtained from all three genotypes after colchicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1543 · show in text ↑
e1

“superior to the conventional anther culture method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1672 · show in text ↑
e2

“studied in wheat, Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–185 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended colchicine addition to induction medium for wheat breeding programmes.

Outcome
introduced into wheat breeding programmese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of colchicine to induction medium was superior to the conventional anther culture method and it could therefore be introduced into wheat breeding programmes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1740 · show in text ↑

colchicine · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

colchicine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.