Abstract
Abstract The effects of fertilisers, frequency of cutting, row spacing and simazine on the yields of dry matter and extractable protein from lucerne ( Medicago sativa L.) were studied using the laboratory‐scale pulper and press. Between 40 and 65% protein nitrogen was extractable; extractability was not affected by the various treatments but altered with season. Lucerne responded with increased yields of dry matter and extractable protein to fertilisers, simazine (35 g/ha) and rows spaced at 30.5 cm. Six or 8 harvests were found to give greater yields than 5 harvests in 180 days. The annual yields of extractable protein reached 3100 kg/ha and it is felt that better control of pests could lead to even greater yields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Between 40 and 65% of lucerne protein nitrogen was extractable.
- Taxon
- lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- protein nitrogen was extractablee0
- Value
- 40 and 65%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Between 40 and 65% protein nitrogen was extractable”
t0“lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatments did not change extractability of lucerne protein nitrogen.
- Taxon
- lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- various treatmentse0
- Outcome
- extractabilitye0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“extractability was not affected by the various treatments but altered with season.”
t0“lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Lucerne protein extractability varied with season.
- Taxon
- lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- extractabilitye0
- Direction
- alterede0
- Setting
- seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“extractability was not affected by the various treatments but altered with season.”
t0“lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizers increased lucerne dry matter and extractable protein yields.
- Taxon
- Lucerne
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- fertiliserse0
- Outcome
- yields of dry matter and extractable proteine0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Lucerne responded with increased yields of dry matter and extractable protein to fertilisers, simazine (35 g/ha) and rows spaced at 30.5 cm.”
Claim · model-written summary
Simazine at 35 g/ha increased lucerne dry matter and extractable protein yields.
- Taxon
- Lucerne
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- simazine (35 g/ha)e0
- Outcome
- yields of dry matter and extractable proteine0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Lucerne responded with increased yields of dry matter and extractable protein to fertilisers, simazine (35 g/ha) and rows spaced at 30.5 cm.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rows spaced at 30.5 cm increased lucerne dry matter and extractable protein yields.
- Taxon
- Lucerne
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- rows spaced at 30.5 cme0
- Outcome
- yields of dry matter and extractable proteine0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Lucerne responded with increased yields of dry matter and extractable protein to fertilisers, simazine (35 g/ha) and rows spaced at 30.5 cm.”
Claim · model-written summary
Six harvests yielded more than five harvests in 180 days.
- Taxon
- lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- Sixe0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- 180 dayse0
- Comparator
- 5 harvestse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Six or 8 harvests were found to give greater yields than 5 harvests in 180 days.”
t0“lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Eight harvests yielded more than five harvests in 180 days.
- Taxon
- lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- 8 harvestse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- 180 dayse0
- Comparator
- 5 harvestse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Six or 8 harvests were found to give greater yields than 5 harvests in 180 days.”
t0“lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Annual extractable protein yield from lucerne reached 3100 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- annual yields of extractable proteine0
- Value
- 3100 kg/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The annual yields of extractable protein reached 3100 kg/ha”
t0“lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest better pest control could raise lucerne yields further.
- Taxon
- lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- better control of pestse0
- Qualifier
- could lead to even greater yieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“it is felt that better control of pests could lead to even greater yields.”
t0“lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)”
The same questions in other papers
simazine · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.