Abstract
Nitrogen rate studies were conducted under furrow‐irrigated corn ( Zea mays L.) production on a silty clay soil to compare granular urea with polymer‐coated urea (PCU) and stabilized urea (SU, contains urease and nitrification inhibitors) effects on corn yields, plant N uptake, and N use efficiency. Polymer‐coated urea had a yield advantage over urea 2 (continuous corn) of 3 yr at N rates below maximum yield, which resulted in greater economic returns with PCU (4–14%) at N rates from 168 to 280 kg N ha −1 . The SU fertilizer had no yield or economic advantage over urea. Grain and stover yields and N uptake increased with increasing N rate for all N sources. Expressing grain yields from all N sources as a linear‐plateau function of N rate showed that yields were maximized at 14.3 Mg ha −1 at an N rate of 254 kg N ha −1 or available N level (soil NO 3 –N plus fertilizer N) of 295 kg N ha −1 . Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE) tended not to vary with N rate, with no differences between SU and urea but greater RE (19%) with PCU than urea under continuous corn. Fertilizer N use efficiency did not vary with N rate but was greater for PCU (36%) than for urea (32%) under continuous corn. In contrast to SU, PCU provided grain yield and potential economic advantages over urea under continuous corn production at N rates below those needed with urea for maximum grain yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
PCU had a corn yield advantage over urea in two of three continuous-corn years below maximum-yield N rates.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Polymer‐coated ureae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- advantagee0
- Qualifier
- 2 (continuous corn) of 3 yr at N rates below maximum yielde0
- Comparator
- ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Polymer‐coated urea had a yield advantage over urea 2 (continuous corn) of 3 yr at N rates below maximum yield”
Claim · model-written summary
PCU increased economic returns by 4–14% at 168 to 280 kg N ha −1.
- Treatment
- PCUe0
- Outcome
- economic returnse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 4–14%e0
- Qualifier
- N rates from 168 to 280 kg N ha −1e0
- Comparator
- ureae1
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“which resulted in greater economic returns with PCU (4–14%) at N rates from 168 to 280 kg N ha −1 .”
e1“Polymer‐coated urea had a yield advantage over urea 2 (continuous corn) of 3 yr at N rates below maximum yield”
Claim · model-written summary
SU had no corn yield advantage over urea.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- SU fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no yield or economic advantagee0
- Comparator
- ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The SU fertilizer had no yield or economic advantage over urea.”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
SU had no economic advantage over urea.
- Treatment
- SU fertilizere0
- Outcome
- economic advantagee0
- Direction
- no yield or economic advantagee0
- Comparator
- ureae0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The SU fertilizer had no yield or economic advantage over urea.”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain and stover yields and N uptake increased with N rate for all corn nitrogen sources.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- increasing N ratee0
- Outcome
- Grain and stover yields and N uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- all N sourcese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain and stover yields and N uptake increased with increasing N rate for all N sources.”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
A linear-plateau model placed maximum corn grain yield at 14.3 Mg ha −1 with 254 kg N ha −1 or 295 kg N ha −1 available N.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- maximizede0
- Value
- 14.3 Mg ha −1e0
- Qualifier
- at an N rate of 254 kg N ha −1 or available N level (soil NO 3 –N plus fertilizer N) of 295 kg N ha −1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Expressing grain yields from all N sources as a linear‐plateau function of N rate showed that yields were maximized at 14.3 Mg ha −1 at an N rate of 254 kg N ha −1 or available N level (soil NO 3 –N plus fertilizer N) of 295 kg N ha −1 .”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn nitrogen recovery efficiency tended not to vary with nitrogen rate.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- N ratee0
- Outcome
- Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE)e0
- Direction
- not to varye0
- Qualifier
- tendede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE) tended not to vary with N rate”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen recovery efficiency did not differ between SU and urea.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- SUe0
- Outcome
- Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE)e0
- Direction
- no differencese0
- Comparator
- ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE) tended not to vary with N rate, with no differences between SU and urea but greater RE (19%) with PCU than urea under continuous corn.”
Claim · model-written summary
PCU had 19% greater recovery efficiency than urea under continuous corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- PCUe0
- Outcome
- REe0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 19%e0
- Comparator
- ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“greater RE (19%) with PCU than urea under continuous corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer N use efficiency did not vary with N rate.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- N ratee0
- Outcome
- Fertilizer N use efficiencye0
- Direction
- did not varye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fertilizer N use efficiency did not vary with N rate but was greater for PCU (36%) than for urea (32%) under continuous corn.”
Claim · model-written summary
PCU fertilizer N use efficiency was 36%, greater than urea at 32%, under continuous corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- PCUe0
- Outcome
- Fertilizer N use efficiencye0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 36%e0
- Qualifier
- 32%e0
- Comparator
- ureae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fertilizer N use efficiency did not vary with N rate but was greater for PCU (36%) than for urea (32%) under continuous corn.”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
190 papers more in this group
See all 194 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.