Paper · 2013 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen Source and Rate Effects on Irrigated Corn Yields and Nitrogen‐Use Efficiency

Ardell D. Halvorson; Michael E. Bartolo

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
60
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nitrogen rate studies were conducted under furrow‐irrigated corn ( Zea mays L.) production on a silty clay soil to compare granular urea with polymer‐coated urea (PCU) and stabilized urea (SU, contains urease and nitrification inhibitors) effects on corn yields, plant N uptake, and N use efficiency. Polymer‐coated urea had a yield advantage over urea 2 (continuous corn) of 3 yr at N rates below maximum yield, which resulted in greater economic returns with PCU (4–14%) at N rates from 168 to 280 kg N ha −1 . The SU fertilizer had no yield or economic advantage over urea. Grain and stover yields and N uptake increased with increasing N rate for all N sources. Expressing grain yields from all N sources as a linear‐plateau function of N rate showed that yields were maximized at 14.3 Mg ha −1 at an N rate of 254 kg N ha −1 or available N level (soil NO 3 –N plus fertilizer N) of 295 kg N ha −1 . Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE) tended not to vary with N rate, with no differences between SU and urea but greater RE (19%) with PCU than urea under continuous corn. Fertilizer N use efficiency did not vary with N rate but was greater for PCU (36%) than for urea (32%) under continuous corn. In contrast to SU, PCU provided grain yield and potential economic advantages over urea under continuous corn production at N rates below those needed with urea for maximum grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU had a corn yield advantage over urea in two of three continuous-corn years below maximum-yield N rates.

Treatment
Polymer‐coated ureae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
advantagee0
Qualifier
2 (continuous corn) of 3 yr at N rates below maximum yielde0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polymer‐coated urea had a yield advantage over urea 2 (continuous corn) of 3 yr at N rates below maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU increased economic returns by 4–14% at 168 to 280 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
PCUe0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
4–14%e0
Qualifier
N rates from 168 to 280 kg N ha −1e0
Comparator
ureae1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“which resulted in greater economic returns with PCU (4–14%) at N rates from 168 to 280 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–512 · show in text ↑
e1

“Polymer‐coated urea had a yield advantage over urea 2 (continuous corn) of 3 yr at N rates below maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SU had no corn yield advantage over urea.

Treatment
SU fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no yield or economic advantagee0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SU fertilizer had no yield or economic advantage over urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SU had no economic advantage over urea.

Treatment
SU fertilizere0
Outcome
economic advantagee0
Direction
no yield or economic advantagee0
Comparator
ureae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The SU fertilizer had no yield or economic advantage over urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and stover yields and N uptake increased with N rate for all corn nitrogen sources.

Treatment
increasing N ratee0
Outcome
Grain and stover yields and N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all N sourcese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and stover yields and N uptake increased with increasing N rate for all N sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A linear-plateau model placed maximum corn grain yield at 14.3 Mg ha −1 with 254 kg N ha −1 or 295 kg N ha −1 available N.

Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
14.3 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
at an N rate of 254 kg N ha −1 or available N level (soil NO 3 –N plus fertilizer N) of 295 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Expressing grain yields from all N sources as a linear‐plateau function of N rate showed that yields were maximized at 14.3 Mg ha −1 at an N rate of 254 kg N ha −1 or available N level (soil NO 3 –N plus fertilizer N) of 295 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn nitrogen recovery efficiency tended not to vary with nitrogen rate.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE)e0
Direction
not to varye0
Qualifier
tendede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE) tended not to vary with N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen recovery efficiency did not differ between SU and urea.

Treatment
SUe0
Outcome
Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE)e0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE) tended not to vary with N rate, with no differences between SU and urea but greater RE (19%) with PCU than urea under continuous corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU had 19% greater recovery efficiency than urea under continuous corn.

Treatment
PCUe0
Outcome
REe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater RE (19%) with PCU than urea under continuous corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N use efficiency did not vary with N rate.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
Fertilizer N use efficiencye0
Direction
did not varye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N use efficiency did not vary with N rate but was greater for PCU (36%) than for urea (32%) under continuous corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU fertilizer N use efficiency was 36%, greater than urea at 32%, under continuous corn.

Treatment
PCUe0
Outcome
Fertilizer N use efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
36%e0
Qualifier
32%e0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N use efficiency did not vary with N rate but was greater for PCU (36%) than for urea (32%) under continuous corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1198 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

194 papers: 142 positive, 52 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

190 papers more in this group

See all 194 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.