Paper · 2015 · Weed Technology

Response of Bell Pepper and Broccoli to Simulated Drift Rates of 2,4-D and Dicamba

Mohsen Mohseni-Moghadam; Douglas Doohan

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Wooster, OH, in 2010 and 2011 to evaluate the effect of simulated drift rates of 2,4-D, dicamba, and 2,4-D plus glyphosate on processing broccoli and bell pepper. Treatments were made in July of each year when bell pepper and broccoli were at the 10- and eight-leaf stage, respectively, and included five 2,4-D rates (1/50, 1/100, 1/150, 1/200, and 1/400 of the recommended field rate of 840 g ae ha −1 ), five dicamba rates (1/50, 1/100, 1/150, 1/200, and 1/400 of the recommended field rate of 560 g ae ha −1 ), and three rates of 2,4-D plus glyphosate (1/100, 1/200, and 1/400 of the recommended field rates). Crop injury was recorded at 7 and 28 d after treatment (DAT). Broccoli and bell pepper responded differently to simulated drift rates each year with higher initial injury ratings observed in 2010, and more persistent symptoms in 2011. 2,4-D at the 1/50 rate reduced broccoli yield by approximately 50% in 2010. Simulated drift rates of 2,4-D did not cause broccoli yield reduction in 2011, nor did simulated drift rates of dicamba, or 2,4-D plus glyphosate reduce yield either year. Although simulated drift treatments did not reduce total yield of bell pepper, the timing of fruit maturity was affected. Yield at first harvest was reduced by high simulated drift rates of each herbicide and by the herbicide tank mix. These results indicate that broccoli and bell pepper are sensitive to very low doses of 2,4-D and dicamba that are typical of those encountered in drift events. The impact of actual drift on delayed maturity and total yield of these crops is likely to be costly for the farmer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli and bell pepper had higher initial injury in 2010.

Taxon
Broccoli and bell peppere0
Treatment
simulated drift ratese0
Outcome
initial injury ratingse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2010e0

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and bell pepper responded differently to simulated drift rates each year with higher initial injury ratings observed in 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli and bell pepper had more persistent symptoms in 2011.

Taxon
Broccoli and bell peppere0
Treatment
simulated drift ratese0
Outcome
symptomse0
Direction
more persistente0
Comparator
2011e0

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli and bell pepper responded differently to simulated drift rates each year with higher initial injury ratings observed in 2010, and more persistent symptoms in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1/50 rate of 2,4-D reduced broccoli yield approximately 50% in 2010.

Treatment
2,4-D at the 1/50 ratee0
Outcome
broccoli yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
approximately 50%e0
Setting
2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,4-D at the 1/50 rate reduced broccoli yield by approximately 50% in 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated 2,4-D drift did not reduce broccoli yield in 2011.

Treatment
Simulated drift rates of 2,4-De0
Outcome
broccoli yielde0
Direction
did not causee0
Setting
2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated drift rates of 2,4-D did not cause broccoli yield reduction in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated dicamba drift did not reduce broccoli yield in either year.

Treatment
simulated drift rates of dicambae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
nor dide0
Qualifier
either yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor did simulated drift rates of dicamba, or 2,4-D plus glyphosate reduce yield either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated 2,4-D plus glyphosate drift did not reduce broccoli yield in either year.

Treatment
2,4-D plus glyphosatee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
nor dide0
Qualifier
either yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor did simulated drift rates of dicamba, or 2,4-D plus glyphosate reduce yield either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated drift treatments did not reduce total bell pepper yield.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Treatment
simulated drift treatmentse0
Outcome
total yield of bell peppere0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“simulated drift treatments did not reduce total yield of bell pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated drift treatments affected the timing of bell pepper fruit maturity.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Treatment
simulated drift treatmentse0
Outcome
timing of fruit maturitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Although simulated drift treatments did not reduce total yield of bell pepper, the timing of fruit maturity was affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High simulated herbicide drift rates reduced yield at first bell pepper harvest.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
high simulated drift rates of each herbicidee0
Outcome
Yield at first harveste0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yield at first harvest was reduced by high simulated drift rates of each herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide tank mix reduced yield at first bell pepper harvest.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
herbicide tank mixe0
Outcome
Yield at first harveste0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yield at first harvest was reduced by high simulated drift rates of each herbicide and by the herbicide tank mix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude broccoli and bell pepper are sensitive to low drift doses of 2,4-D and dicamba.

Taxon
broccoli and bell peppere0
Outcome
sensitive to very low doses of 2,4-D and dicambae0

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli and bell pepper are sensitive to very low doses of 2,4-D and dicamba that are typical of those encountered in drift events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1527 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

dicamba · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.