Paper · 2005 · Plant Disease

Variation in Septoria musiva and Implications for Disease Resistance Screening of Poplars

K. T. Ward; M. E. Ostry

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A set of isolates of Septoria musiva differed in aggressiveness in hybrid poplar leaf disk and stem assays and culture growth in vitro. Clone × isolate interactions were observed in one of the stem assay experiments, but not in the leaf disk assay experiments. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses were performed using 52 isolates of S. musiva collected from hybrid poplars and a native poplar species in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, South Dakota, and North Dakota. There was a large degree of genetic similarity, although each isolate had a unique RAPD pattern. No relationships among isolates were found for molecular genetic distance and host clone, parentage, or taxonomic classification section; location or date of collection; or the previously determined level of field resistance of the host clones to Septoria canker. Results of the stem and leaf disk assays indicate that it may not be necessary to choose the most aggressive isolate for disease resistance screening. It may be more useful to select isolates that will discriminate the greatest variation in levels of disease resistance among the clones that are being screened.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Septoria musiva isolates differed in aggressiveness in hybrid poplar leaf disks.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Organ / stage
leaf diske0
Interactor
Septoria musivaSphaerulina musivae0pathogen
Outcome
aggressivenesse0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A set of isolates of Septoria musiva differed in aggressiveness in hybrid poplar leaf disk and stem assays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Septoria musiva isolates differed in aggressiveness in hybrid poplar stems.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Organ / stage
steme0
Interactor
Septoria musivaSphaerulina musivae0pathogen
Outcome
aggressivenesse0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A set of isolates of Septoria musiva differed in aggressiveness in hybrid poplar leaf disk and stem assays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolates differed in culture growth in vitro.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Interactor
Septoria musivaSphaerulina musivae0pathogen
Outcome
culture growth in vitroe0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A set of isolates of Septoria musiva differed in aggressiveness in hybrid poplar leaf disk and stem assays and culture growth in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone by isolate interactions occurred in one stem assay.

Taxon
PoplarsPopulust0
Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
Clone × isolate interactionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clone × isolate interactions were observed in one of the stem assay experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone by isolate interactions were absent in leaf disk assays.

Taxon
PoplarsPopulust0
Organ / stage
leaf diske1
Outcome
Clone × isolate interactionse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not in the leaf disk assay experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“Clone × isolate interactions were observed in one of the stem assay experiments, but not in the leaf disk assay experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolates showed substantial genetic similarity.

Taxon
hybrid poplarsPopuluse1
Interactor
S. musivaSphaerulina musivae1pathogen
Outcome
genetic similaritye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a large degree of genetic similarity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–523 · show in text ↑
e1

“52 isolates of S. musiva collected from hybrid poplars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each isolate had a unique RAPD pattern.

Taxon
hybrid poplarsPopuluse1
Interactor
S. musivaSphaerulina musivae1pathogen
Outcome
unique RAPD patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“each isolate had a unique RAPD pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–572 · show in text ↑
e1

“52 isolates of S. musiva collected from hybrid poplars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–385 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate molecular genetic distance showed no relationship with host clone, parentage, taxonomic section, collection location or date, or host field resistance.

Taxon
hybrid poplarsPopuluse1
Material
host clonee0
Interactor
S. musivaSphaerulina musivae1pathogen
Outcome
molecular genetic distancee0
Direction
No relationshipse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No relationships among isolates were found for molecular genetic distance and host clone, parentage, or taxonomic classification section; location or date of collection; or the previously determined level of field resistance of the host clones to Septoria canker”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“52 isolates of S. musiva collected from hybrid poplars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–385 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting the most aggressive isolate may be unnecessary for disease resistance screening.

Taxon
PoplarsPopulust0
Outcome
choose the most aggressive isolate for disease resistance screeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it may not be necessary to choose the most aggressive isolate for disease resistance screening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting isolates that discriminate resistance variation among clones may be more useful.

Taxon
PoplarsPopulust0
Outcome
select isolates that will discriminate the greatest variation in levels of disease resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It may be more useful to select isolates that will discriminate the greatest variation in levels of disease resistance among the clones that are being screened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–89 · show in text ↑