Abstract
Corn silage was harvested in two successive years at the hard dough stage (normal) and seven to eight weeks later after full maturity and additional weathering (late). Dr)" matter yield was 19 to 27% less when harvested late. Dry matter content of the normal crops at harvest was 26 and 30%; that of late harvested crops was 58 and 63%. Average dry matter recovery rate was slightly lower in the normal silage, 92 vs. 96, and no differences in feeding value were detected when fed in a mixed ration for milking cows. Small reductions in the digestibility of dry matter and acid detergent fiber in late silage were noted in one year (60 vs. 63%), as was a tendency to heat when fed in hot weather. Normal silage contained more acetic, propionic, butyric, and lactic acid than late silage (2.8, 0.2, 0.2, and 7.8 vs. 1.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 3.7%, respectively). The results indicated that production of high quality silage from late harvesting is quite possible under good storage conditions, but the practice would usually be impractical because of high field losses.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Late harvest reduced corn dry matter yield by 19 to 27%.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- harvested latee0
- Outcome
- Dr)" matter yielde0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 19 to 27%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn”
e0“Dr)" matter yield was 19 to 27% less when harvested late”
Claim · model-written summary
Late harvested crops had higher dry matter content than normal crops.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- late harvestede0
- Outcome
- Dry matter contente0
- Value
- 58 and 63%e0
- Qualifier
- 26 and 30%e0
- Comparator
- normal cropse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn”
e0“Dry matter content of the normal crops at harvest was 26 and 30%; that of late harvested crops was 58 and 63%”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal silage had slightly lower dry matter recovery than late silage.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- normal silagee0
- Outcome
- dry matter recovery ratee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 92 vs. 96e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn”
e0“Average dry matter recovery rate was slightly lower in the normal silage, 92 vs. 96”
Claim · model-written summary
Feeding value did not differ when silage was fed in a mixed ration for milking cows.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- feeding valuee0
- Direction
- no differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn”
e0“no differences in feeding value were detected when fed in a mixed ration for milking cows”
Claim · model-written summary
Late silage had slightly reduced dry matter and acid detergent fiber digestibility in one year.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- late silagee0
- Outcome
- digestibility of dry matter and acid detergent fibere0
- Direction
- reductionse0
- Value
- 60 vs. 63%e0
- Qualifier
- in one yeare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn”
e0“Small reductions in the digestibility of dry matter and acid detergent fiber in late silage were noted in one year (60 vs. 63%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Late silage tended to heat when fed in hot weather.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- tendency to heate0
- Qualifier
- when fed in hot weathere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn”
e0“a tendency to heat when fed in hot weather”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal silage had more acetic, propionic, butyric and lactic acid than late silage.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Normal silagee0
- Outcome
- acetic, propionic, butyric, and lactic acide0
- Direction
- moree0
- Qualifier
- 2.8, 0.2, 0.2, and 7.8 vs. 1.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 3.7%e0
- Comparator
- late silagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn”
e0“Normal silage contained more acetic, propionic, butyric, and lactic acid than late silage (2.8, 0.2, 0.2, and 7.8 vs. 1.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 3.7%, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
High quality silage from late harvest was considered possible under good storage, but usually impractical due to field losses.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- the practice would usually be impracticale0
- Qualifier
- under good storage conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn”
e0“production of high quality silage from late harvesting is quite possible under good storage conditions, but the practice would usually be impractical because of high field losses”
The same questions in other papers
processing · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →processing · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →processing · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.