Paper · 2008 · Agronomy Journal

Summer Cover Crop and Management System affect Lettuce and Cantaloupe Production System

Guangyao Wang; Mathieu Ngouajio; Milton E. McGiffen; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cover crops are widely used in both conventional and organic systems to protect and improve the soil. This study evaluated the effect of summer cover crop and management system on the production of fall romaine lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) and spring cantaloupe ( Cucumis melo L.) from 1999 to 2003. Cover crop treatments included cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] incorporated (CPI), cowpea used as mulch (CPM), sudangrass [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] incorporated (SGI), and a bare ground control (BG). The management system treatments included conventional (CON), integrated crop management (ICM), and organic (ORG). The CPM and SGI increased soil organic matter content and changed the soil N profile. Soil organic matter was higher and nitrate leaching was lower in the ORG system. The CPM plots had less weed growth during the lettuce crop, but higher weed biomass during the cantaloupe crop in the first year. During the cantaloupe season, weed biomass in the ORG increased over years relative to the CON system. The CPI plots had the highest lettuce yield in the first 2 yr, while SGI and CPI had higher cantaloupe yield. Lettuce yield in the ORG system increased over years relative to the CON system, but cantaloupe yield in the ORG system was lower in all four seasons. This study showed that cover crops could be used to improve cropping systems and that the soil and plants previously under long‐term conventional system changed significantly during organic transition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea mulch (CPM) and incorporated sudangrass (SGI) increased soil organic matter content.

Treatment
CPM and SGIe1
Outcome
soil organic matter contente1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce and Cantaloupe Production System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CPM and SGI increased soil organic matter content and changed the soil N profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea mulch (CPM) and incorporated sudangrass (SGI) changed the soil N profile.

Treatment
CPM and SGIe1
Outcome
soil N profilee1
Direction
changede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce and Cantaloupe Production System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CPM and SGI increased soil organic matter content and changed the soil N profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter was higher in the organic (ORG) management system.

Treatment
ORG systeme2
Outcome
Soil organic mattere2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce and Cantaloupe Production System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil organic matter was higher and nitrate leaching was lower in the ORG system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate leaching was lower in the organic (ORG) management system.

Treatment
ORG systeme2
Outcome
nitrate leachinge2
Direction
lowere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce and Cantaloupe Production System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil organic matter was higher and nitrate leaching was lower in the ORG system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea mulch (CPM) plots had less weed growth during the lettuce crop.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae3
Treatment
CPM plotse3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
weed growthe3
Direction
lesse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The CPM plots had less weed growth during the lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea mulch (CPM) plots had higher weed biomass during the cantaloupe crop in the first year.

Treatment
CPM plotse3
Interactor
weede4weed
Outcome
weed biomasse4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
in the first yeare4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The CPM plots had less weed growth during the lettuce crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–852 · show in text ↑
e4

“but higher weed biomass during the cantaloupe crop in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed biomass in the organic (ORG) system increased over years relative to the conventional (CON) system during the cantaloupe season.

Treatment
ORGe5
Interactor
weede5weed
Outcome
weed biomasse5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
over yearse5
Comparator
CON systeme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“During the cantaloupe season, weed biomass in the ORG increased over years relative to the CON system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CPI plots had the highest lettuce yield in the first 2 years.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae6
Treatment
CPI plotse6
Outcome
lettuce yielde6
Direction
higheste6
Qualifier
in the first 2 yre6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The CPI plots had the highest lettuce yield in the first 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SGI and CPI treatments had higher cantaloupe yield.

Treatment
SGI and CPIe7
Outcome
cantaloupe yielde7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“while SGI and CPI had higher cantaloupe yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce yield in the organic (ORG) system increased over years relative to the conventional (CON) system.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
ORG systeme1
Outcome
Lettuce yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
over yearse1
Comparator
CON systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce yield in the ORG system increased over years relative to the CON system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cantaloupe yield in the organic (ORG) system was lower in all four seasons.

Treatment
ORG systeme1
Outcome
cantaloupe yielde1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
in all four seasonse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cantaloupe yield in the ORG system was lower in all four seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and plants previously under long-term conventional management changed significantly during organic transition.

Outcome
soil and plantse2
Direction
changed significantlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce and Cantaloupe Production System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“changed significantly during organic transition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1488 · show in text ↑
e2

“the soil and plants previously under long”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1415 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops could be used to improve cropping systems.

Treatment
cover cropse1
Outcome
improve cropping systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lettuce and Cantaloupe Production System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“cover crops could be used to improve cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1364 · show in text ↑

mulching · soil: chemistry · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mulching · weed · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 16 positive, 8 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

cultivation system · soil: chemistry · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · weed · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.