Paper · 2011 · Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova

Response of proline, soluble sugars and antioxidant enzymes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to different irrigation regimes in greenhouse condition

H. Nazarli; F. Faraji

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To evaluate the response of proline and soluble sugars content, catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity in wheat leaves to different irrigation regimes at two growth stages, a greenhouse factorial experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. The factors consisted of four different irrigation regimes as 100% (I0), 75% (I1), 50% (I2) and 25% (I3) of field capacity and growth stages: 50% emergence to booting stage (GS1) and booting stage to physiological maturity (GS2). Fresh leaf tissues were used to determine proline and soluble sugars content, CAT and APX activity. According to the results, irrigation regimes had significant effect on proline content, soluble sugars and APX activity, but no significant differences were detected among irrigation regimes for catalase (CAT) activity. Limited irrigation increased proline concentration and total soluble sugars in leaves. None of studied traits were affected by growth stages. Interaction between irrigation regimes and growth stages was not significant for all studied traits. Results indicated that the highest proline content (12 μmol/g DW), total soluble sugars (49 mg/g DW) and APX activity (42 μmol min-1 g-1 FW) were related to irrigation at 25% of field capacity (I3). It was concluded that proline and soluble sugar levels were increased in wheat leaves under deficit irrigation regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited irrigation increased proline concentration and total soluble sugars in wheat leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
Limited irrigatione1
Outcome
proline concentration and total soluble sugarse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate the response of proline and soluble sugars content, catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity in wheat leaves to different irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e1

“Limited irrigation increased proline concentration and total soluble sugars in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation regimes had a significant effect on proline content, soluble sugars and APX activity in wheat.

Treatment
irrigation regimese6
Outcome
proline content, soluble sugars and APX activitye6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate the response of proline and soluble sugars content, catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity in wheat leaves to different irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e6

“irrigation regimes had significant effect on proline content, soluble sugars and APX activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 25% of field capacity gave the highest proline content (12 μmol/g DW) in wheat leaves.

Treatment
irrigation at 25% of field capacitye2
Outcome
proline contente2
Direction
higheste2
Value
12 μmol/g DWe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate the response of proline and soluble sugars content, catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity in wheat leaves to different irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest proline content (12 μmol/g DW), total soluble sugars (49 mg/g DW) and APX activity (42 μmol min-1 g-1 FW) were related to irrigation at 25% of field capacity (I3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 25% of field capacity gave the highest total soluble sugars (49 mg/g DW) in wheat leaves.

Treatment
irrigation at 25% of field capacitye2
Outcome
total soluble sugarse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
49 mg/g DWe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate the response of proline and soluble sugars content, catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity in wheat leaves to different irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest proline content (12 μmol/g DW), total soluble sugars (49 mg/g DW) and APX activity (42 μmol min-1 g-1 FW) were related to irrigation at 25% of field capacity (I3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 25% of field capacity gave the highest APX activity (42 μmol min-1 g-1 FW) in wheat leaves.

Treatment
irrigation at 25% of field capacitye2
Outcome
APX activitye2
Direction
higheste2
Value
42 μmol min-1 g-1 FWe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate the response of proline and soluble sugars content, catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity in wheat leaves to different irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest proline content (12 μmol/g DW), total soluble sugars (49 mg/g DW) and APX activity (42 μmol min-1 g-1 FW) were related to irrigation at 25% of field capacity (I3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation regimes did not significantly change catalase activity in wheat.

Treatment
irrigation regimese3
Outcome
catalase (CAT) activitye3
Direction
no significant differencese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate the response of proline and soluble sugars content, catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity in wheat leaves to different irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“no significant differences were detected among irrigation regimes for catalase (CAT) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth stage did not affect any of the studied wheat traits.

Treatment
growth stagese4
Outcome
studied traitse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate the response of proline and soluble sugars content, catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity in wheat leaves to different irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e4

“None of studied traits were affected by growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–992 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between irrigation regime and growth stage was not significant for any studied trait.

Treatment
Interaction between irrigation regimes and growth stagese5
Outcome
all studied traitse5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate the response of proline and soluble sugars content, catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity in wheat leaves to different irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e5

“Interaction between irrigation regimes and growth stages was not significant for all studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1093 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.