Paper · 1979 · Agronomy Journal

Tolerance of Cotton to the Herbicide Glyphosate1

T. N. Jordan; R. R. Bridge

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract An increasing group of weed pests in U.S. cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) are the perennial grasses which can be controlled with glyphosate [ N ‐phosphonomethyl) glycine], but cotton is also sensitive to this herbicide. Field studies were initiated to determine if certain cotton genotypes could be selected with sufficient tolerance to glyphosate to allow its use in a cotton‐weed control program. In 1974,405 genotypes were evaluated for tolerance to glyphosate at rates of 0.84, 1.68, and 3.36 kg/ha applied as an over‐the‐top treatment in the early bloom stage. In 1975, 24 genotypes selected from 1974 studies were screened at rates of 0.56 and 0.84 kg/ha of glyphosate ap lied over‐the‐top of cotton plants. Six genotypes selected from previous studies were evaluated with glyphosate applied over‐the‐top or directed under cotton plants 50 to 62 cm in height in the very early square stage. Glyphosate toxicity varied with cotton genotypes and increased with increasing rates. In 1976 and 1977, all genotypes that received an over‐the‐top treatment of glyphosate yielded significantly less seed cotton than the untreated checks. Glyphosate applied as a directed post‐emergence treatment did not cause significant injury symptoms in treated cotton, however, none of the treated genotypes produced seed cotton yields equal to their untreated controls. Cotton injury was only 10% or less when the herbicide was directed to the base of the plants as compared with 65 to 80%, injury when the herbicide was applied over‐the‐top. Two genotypes (DES 04‐11 and DES 04‐606) yielded over 100% of their untreated controls when one or two separate applications of 0.56 kg/ha of glyphosate was directed to the base of the cotton plants in 1977. The increase in yield of these two genotypes was not significant, but indicated a level of glyphosate tolerance which could be used in the development of commercial cultivars possessing enough tolerance to glyphosate to allow its use for perennial weed control in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate toxicity varied among cotton genotypes.

Material
cotton genotypese0
Outcome
Glyphosate toxicitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate toxicity varied with cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–954 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate toxicity rose with increasing rates.

Treatment
increasing ratese0
Outcome
toxicitye1
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased with increasing rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glyphosate toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Over-the-top glyphosate reduced seed cotton yield relative to untreated checks in 1976 and 1977.

Treatment
over‐the‐top treatment of glyphosatee0
Outcome
seed cottone0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
untreated checkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1976 and 1977, all genotypes that received an over‐the‐top treatment of glyphosate yielded significantly less seed cotton than the untreated checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Directed post-emergence glyphosate produced no significant injury symptoms.

Treatment
Glyphosate applied as a directed post‐emergence treatmente0
Outcome
injury symptomse0
Direction
did not causee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate applied as a directed post‐emergence treatment did not cause significant injury symptoms in treated cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Directed glyphosate treatments yielded less seed cotton than untreated controls.

Treatment
treated genotypese0
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse0
Direction
none of the treated genotypes produced seed cotton yields equal toe0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the treated genotypes produced seed cotton yields equal to their untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Base-directed glyphosate caused at most 10% cotton injury.

Treatment
herbicide was directed to the base of the plantse0
Outcome
Cotton injurye0
Direction
lesse0
Value
10% or lesse0
Qualifier
65 to 80%e0
Comparator
herbicide was applied over‐the‐tope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton injury was only 10% or less when the herbicide was directed to the base of the plants as compared with 65 to 80%, injury when the herbicide was applied over‐the‐top”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DES 04‐11 exceeded its untreated yield under base-directed glyphosate in 1977.

Material
DES 04‐11e0
Treatment
one or two separate applications of 0.56 kg/ha of glyphosatee0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
overe0
Value
over 100%e0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two genotypes (DES 04‐11 and DES 04‐606) yielded over 100% of their untreated controls when one or two separate applications of 0.56 kg/ha of glyphosate was directed to the base of the cotton plants in 1977”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DES 04‐606 exceeded its untreated yield under base-directed glyphosate in 1977.

Material
DES 04‐606e0
Treatment
one or two separate applications of 0.56 kg/ha of glyphosatee0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
overe0
Value
over 100%e0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two genotypes (DES 04‐11 and DES 04‐606) yielded over 100% of their untreated controls when one or two separate applications of 0.56 kg/ha of glyphosate was directed to the base of the cotton plants in 1977”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1744 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

61 papers: 35 positive, 26 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

glyphosate · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 4 positive, 14 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 7 positive, 32 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.