Paper · 2014 · Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

Comparative importance of infection routes for banana Xanthomonas wilt and implications on disease epidemiology and management

Gloria. V. Nakato; W. Ocimati; G. Blomme; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Banana Xanthomonas wilt (XW), caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum (Xcm), results in up to 100% yield loss. The efficiency of XW infection through the corm, pseudostem inoculation at bunch harvest, leaf, female and male bud bracts was evaluated in banana plants. The male and female bud bract inoculations caused the highest incidence (81% and 93%) compared with 0–44% for harvest and corm inoculations. Naturally mediated insect transmission in ‘Pisang Awak’ resulted in up to 99% disease incidence. Floral inoculations and natural insect-mediated infections only resulted in floral symptoms. Symptom development in insect-transmitted infections simulated artificial male bud inoculations, confirming the male bud bract wounds as the main entry points for insect vector-mediated infections, thus reaffirming the importance of continuous and timely debudding to limit insect spread. Leaf and harvest inoculations resulted only in leaf symptoms, while corm inoculations resulted in late floral symptoms. Floral inoculations were the main mode of infection. Single leaf inoculations resulted in 30% plant mortality despite 100% incidence, with 70% of plants recovering and bearing visibly healthy bunches and suckers. Thus, detection of a diseased plant in a mat shouldn’t warrant the destruction of the whole mat. A significant difference in Xcm cfu g−1 was observed between symptomatic and symptomless leaves, suggesting that practices that keep the bacterial load below the disease-causing threshold could benefit the plant. This could explain the observed success of XW control through removal of single diseased stems in farms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Male bud bract inoculation caused 81% disease incidence.

Taxon
Bananae0
Treatment
malee1
Interactor
Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearumXanthomonas vasicola pv. musacearume0pathogen
Outcome
incidencee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
81%e1
Comparator
harvest and corm inoculationse1

Verbatim

e0

“Banana Xanthomonas wilt (XW), caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum (Xcm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“The male and female bud bract inoculations caused the highest incidence (81% and 93%) compared with 0–44% for harvest and corm inoculations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Female bud bract inoculation caused 93% disease incidence.

Taxon
Bananae0
Treatment
female bud bract inoculationse1
Interactor
Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearumXanthomonas vasicola pv. musacearume0pathogen
Outcome
incidencee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
93%e1
Comparator
harvest and corm inoculationse1

Verbatim

e0

“Banana Xanthomonas wilt (XW), caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum (Xcm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“The male and female bud bract inoculations caused the highest incidence (81% and 93%) compared with 0–44% for harvest and corm inoculations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest and corm inoculations caused 0–44% incidence.

Taxon
Bananae0
Treatment
harvest and corm inoculationse1
Interactor
Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearumXanthomonas vasicola pv. musacearume0pathogen
Outcome
incidencee1
Value
0–44%e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Banana Xanthomonas wilt (XW), caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum (Xcm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“The male and female bud bract inoculations caused the highest incidence (81% and 93%) compared with 0–44% for harvest and corm inoculations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–413 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural insect transmission in Pisang Awak caused up to 99% disease incidence.

Taxon
Bananae0
Material
Pisang Awake1
Interactor
Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearumXanthomonas vasicola pv. musacearume0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Value
up to 99%e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Banana Xanthomonas wilt (XW), caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum (Xcm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Naturally mediated insect transmission in ‘Pisang Awak’ resulted in up to 99% disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–510 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral inoculation and natural insect infection produced only floral symptoms.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Floral inoculations and natural insect-mediated infectionse0
Outcome
floral symptomse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Floral inoculations and natural insect-mediated infections only resulted in floral symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–603 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and harvest inoculations produced only leaf symptoms.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Leaf and harvest inoculationse0
Outcome
leaf symptomse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf and harvest inoculations resulted only in leaf symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–954 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corm inoculation produced late floral symptoms.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
corm inoculationse0
Outcome
late floral symptomse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“corm inoculations resulted in late floral symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1012 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral inoculations were the main infection route.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Floral inoculationse0
Outcome
main mode of infectione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Floral inoculations were the main mode of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single leaf inoculation caused 30% plant mortality despite 100% incidence.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Single leaf inoculationse0
Outcome
plant mortalitye0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
despite 100% incidencee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Single leaf inoculations resulted in 30% plant mortality despite 100% incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After single leaf inoculation, 70% of plants recovered and bore healthy bunches and suckers.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plants recovering and bearing visibly healthy bunches and suckerse0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“with 70% of plants recovering and bearing visibly healthy bunches and suckers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1225 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Xcm counts differed significantly between symptomatic and symptomless leaves.

Taxon
bananat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
Xcm cfu g−1e0
Comparator
symptomatic and symptomless leavese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“A significant difference in Xcm cfu g−1 was observed between symptomatic and symptomless leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1419 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend timely continuous debudding to limit insect spread.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
continuous and timely debudding to limit insect spreade0

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“reaffirming the importance of continuous and timely debudding to limit insect spread”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–892 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against destroying a whole mat after detecting one diseased plant.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
shouldn’t warrant the destruction of the whole mate0

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“detection of a diseased plant in a mat shouldn’t warrant the destruction of the whole mat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1322 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of single diseased stems controlled XW on farms.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
removal of single diseased stemse0
Outcome
XW controle0
Setting
farmse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“observed success of XW control through removal of single diseased stems in farms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1640 · show in text ↑

inoculation · pest · MusaPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · Xanthomonas vasicola pv. musacearum · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.