Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Yield and Some Fruit Properties of Strawberry

Lütfi Pırlak; Murat Köse

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
118
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) [(Pseudomonas BA-8 (biological control agent), Bacillus OSU-142 (N2-fixing), and Bacillus M-3 (N2-fixing and phosphate solubilizing)] on yield and some fruit properties of strawberry cultivar 'Selva' in the province of Erzurum, Turkey in 2002–2003. Foliar + root application of PGPR strains significantly increased yield per plant as compared with the control. Root application of PGPR strains significantly increased total soluble solids, total sugar and reduced sugar, but decreased titratable acidity. It was also determined that bacteria applications have no important effect on the average fruit weight and pH. The results of this study suggested that Pseudomonas BA-8, Bacillus OSU-142 and Bacillus M-3 have potential for increasing yield in strawberry plant. Keywords: plant growth promoting rhizobacteriayieldfruit charactersstrawberry ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge Dr. Fikrettin Sahin for supplying bacteria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar and root PGPR application significantly increased yield per plant.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Foliar + root application of PGPR strainse0
Interactor
PGPR strainse0symbiont
Outcome
yield per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar + root application of PGPR strains significantly increased yield per plant as compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root PGPR application increased total soluble solids, total sugar, and reduced sugar.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Root application of PGPR strainse0
Interactor
PGPR strainse0symbiont
Outcome
total soluble solids, total sugar and reduced sugare0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root application of PGPR strains significantly increased total soluble solids, total sugar and reduced sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root PGPR application decreased titratable acidity.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Root application of PGPR strainse0
Interactor
PGPR strainse0symbiont
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root application of PGPR strains significantly increased total soluble solids, total sugar and reduced sugar, but decreased titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial applications had no important effect on average fruit weight or pH.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
bacteria applicationse0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
average fruit weight and pHe0
Direction
no important effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacteria applications have no important effect on the average fruit weight and pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested Pseudomonas BA-8 as a yield-promoting inoculant.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas BA-8e0symbiont
Outcome
potential for increasing yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas BA-8, Bacillus OSU-142 and Bacillus M-3 have potential for increasing yield in strawberry plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–828 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested Bacillus OSU-142 as a yield-promoting inoculant.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
Bacillus OSU-142e0symbiont
Outcome
potential for increasing yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas BA-8, Bacillus OSU-142 and Bacillus M-3 have potential for increasing yield in strawberry plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–828 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested Bacillus M-3 as a yield-promoting inoculant.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
Bacillus M-3e0symbiont
Outcome
potential for increasing yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas BA-8, Bacillus OSU-142 and Bacillus M-3 have potential for increasing yield in strawberry plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–828 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

inoculation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

67 papers: 60 positive, 7 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

inoculation · Bacteria · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 58 positive, 11 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.