Paper · 2011 · Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research

A nine-year evaluation of several scab-resistant apple cultivars for organic fruit production

A. Czynczyk; P. Bielicki; A. Mika; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Suitability of nine scab-resistant or partially scab-resistant apple cultivars: Bohemia, Rubinola, Topaz, Goldstar, Pinova, Redkroft, Free Redstar, Melfree and Gold Milenium for organic orchards was evaluated during the period 2002-2010. The trial consisted of two experimental plots. In the first plot, no plant protection chemicals were applied either to the trees or to the soil. In the second plot, with limited spraying programme, only those compounds that are allowed to be used in organic fruit production in Poland were applied in order to control pests and diseases: copper products, Carpovirusine Super SC and the garlic extract Liquid Bioczos. After planting, the ground in the tree rows was mulched with agricultural spun-web, linen residue felt or sawdust in a 1.2 meter wide strip. During the years of the experiment many trees were seriously infected with apple canker (Nectria sp.), which caused the loss of a certain number of them. Most susceptible were ‘Rubinola’, ‘Topaz’, ‘Redkroft’ and ‘Pinova’. The smallest necrotic lesions were observed on the trees of ‘Free Redstar’, ‘Melfree’ and ‘Gold Milenium’. The various materials for mulching did not significantly affect the size of the fruit yield. The highest yields were obtained from the ‘Gold Milenium’, ‘Free Redstar’, ‘Topaz’ and ‘Pinova’. In 2010, following a very rainy season, we observed for the first time scab potted fruits of the cultivars: Rubinola, Topaz, and Goldstar. The greatest problem was the control of aphids and apple mildew. Cutting back shoots with primary infestation was the most promising method. The ‘Topaz’, ‘Rubinola’, ‘Bohemia’ and ‘Gold Milenium’ appeared to be the most suitable for organic fruit production. In the year 2010, heavy thinning of fruitlets helped to obtain large fruits (diameter over 7.0 cm) of the cultivars: Bohemia, Topaz and Redkroft.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple canker caused loss of some trees.

Interactor
Nectria sp.e0pathogen
Outcome
loss of a certain number of theme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“many trees were seriously infected with apple canker (Nectria sp.), which caused the loss of a certain number of them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubinola, Topaz, Redkroft and Pinova were most susceptible to canker.

Material
‘Rubinola’, ‘Topaz’, ‘Redkroft’ and ‘Pinova’e0
Interactor
Nectria sp.e1pathogen
Outcome
Most susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most susceptible were ‘Rubinola’, ‘Topaz’, ‘Redkroft’ and ‘Pinova’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1016 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple canker (Nectria sp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Free Redstar, Melfree and Gold Milenium had the smallest necrotic lesions.

Material
‘Free Redstar’, ‘Melfree’ and ‘Gold Milenium’e0
Outcome
necrotic lesionse0
Direction
smalleste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The smallest necrotic lesions were observed on the trees of ‘Free Redstar’, ‘Melfree’ and ‘Gold Milenium’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch materials did not significantly affect fruit yield.

Treatment
various materials for mulchinge0
Outcome
size of the fruit yielde0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The various materials for mulching did not significantly affect the size of the fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gold Milenium, Free Redstar, Topaz and Pinova gave the highest yields.

Material
‘Gold Milenium’, ‘Free Redstar’, ‘Topaz’ and ‘Pinova’e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields were obtained from the ‘Gold Milenium’, ‘Free Redstar’, ‘Topaz’ and ‘Pinova’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab appeared in 2010 on Rubinola, Topaz and Goldstar fruit.

Material
Rubinola, Topaz, and Goldstare0
Outcome
scab potted fruitse0
Qualifier
In 2010, following a very rainy seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2010, following a very rainy season, we observed for the first time scab potted fruits of the cultivars: Rubinola, Topaz, and Goldstar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids and apple mildew presented the greatest control problems.

Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
control of aphids and apple mildewe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest problem was the control of aphids and apple mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting back shoots with primary infestation was the most promising control method.

Treatment
Cutting back shoots with primary infestatione0
Outcome
most promising methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cutting back shoots with primary infestation was the most promising method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topaz, Rubinola, Bohemia and Gold Milenium appeared most suitable for organic production.

Material
‘Topaz’, ‘Rubinola’, ‘Bohemia’ and ‘Gold Milenium’e0
Outcome
most suitable for organic fruit productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ‘Topaz’, ‘Rubinola’, ‘Bohemia’ and ‘Gold Milenium’ appeared to be the most suitable for organic fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1711 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy fruitlet thinning helped produce large fruit over 7.0 cm in three cultivars.

Material
Bohemia, Topaz and Redkrofte0
Treatment
heavy thinning of fruitletse0
Outcome
large fruitse0
Direction
largee0
Value
diameter over 7.0 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heavy thinning of fruitlets helped to obtain large fruits (diameter over 7.0 cm) of the cultivars: Bohemia, Topaz and Redkroft”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1857 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

51 papers: 41 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.