Paper · 2005 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of Timing of Sulfur Fertilizer Application on Growth and Yield of Rapeseed

Altaf Ahmad; Ishrat Khan; N. A.M Anjum; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract There is usually a positive yield response when sulfur (S) is applied to rapeseed (Brassica rapa L.) plants grown on S-deficient soils. Recommendations include application of some of or the entire amount of S at planting, but the plant requirement as well as availability of S to rapeseed during its various phenological stages is not well documented. In a field trial, 40 kg S ha−1 was applied as gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) at planting (T1), during vegetative (T2, 30 days after sowing), flowering (T3, 50 days after sowing), and pod-filling (T4, 65 days after sowing) stages, and in split doses (T5). Biomass accumulation, leaf-area index, and leaf photosynthetic rate were studied at various growth stages. Seed S (sulfate and organic S) and yield parameters were studied at harvest. Sulfur (40 kg S ha− 1) applied in three split doses during different growth stages caused maximum increase in these parameters, followed by T2 and T1. However, no significant discernable difference was observed for the application at planting (T1) and during vegetative stage (T2). No significant response was seen following the application of T3 and T4 when compared with the control (T0). On the basis of these results, we concluded that application of S fertilizer in split doses during growth stages is better than application of the entire amount of S at any stage for obtaining optimum yield of rapeseed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur applied in three split doses during growth stages caused the maximum increase in biomass accumulation, leaf-area index and leaf photosynthetic rate, followed by T2 and T1.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
Sulfur (40 kg S ha− 1) applied in three split doses during different growth stagese2
Outcome
Biomass accumulation, leaf-area index, and leaf photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
maximum increasee2
Comparator
T2 and T1e2

Verbatim

e1

“Biomass accumulation, leaf-area index, and leaf photosynthetic rate were studied at various growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sulfur (40 kg S ha− 1) applied in three split doses during different growth stages caused maximum increase in these parameters, followed by T2 and T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur applied at planting (T1) and during the vegetative stage (T2) showed no significant difference.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
application at planting (T1)e3
Outcome
discernable differencee3
Direction
no significant discernable differencee3
Comparator
during vegetative stage (T2)e3

Verbatim

e3

“However, no significant discernable difference was observed for the application at planting (T1) and during vegetative stage (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur applied at flowering (T3) and pod filling (T4) gave no significant response compared with the control (T0).

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
application of T3 and T4e4
Outcome
responsee4
Direction
No significant responsee4
Comparator
control (T0)e4

Verbatim

e4

“No significant response was seen following the application of T3 and T4 when compared with the control (T0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Applying S fertilizer in split doses during growth stages is better for optimum rapeseed yield than applying the entire S amount at any single stage.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
application of S fertilizer in split doses during growth stagese5
Outcome
optimum yielde5
Comparator
application of the entire amount of S at any stagee5

Verbatim

e5

“application of S fertilizer in split doses during growth stages is better than application of the entire amount of S at any stage for obtaining optimum yield of rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑

stage · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.