Abstract
ABSTRACT Gamma irradiation of red capsicums (cv. Five Star) at 75 and 300 Gy had no significant effects on the carotene level of unstored red capsicums or red capsicums stored at 5°C for 3 wk. Gamma irradiation of mangos (cv. Kensington Pride) at 75, 300 and 600 Gy had no significant effects on the carotene content. Altering the conditions of irradiation (lower temperature, nitrogen atmosphere, lower dose rate) resulted in slightly higher carotene levels than those associated with irradiation under normal ambient conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation at 75 or 300 Gy did not significantly affect carotene in unstored red capsicums.
- Taxon
- red capsicumse0
- Material
- Five Stare0
- Treatment
- Gamma irradiatione0
- Outcome
- carotene level of unstored red capsicumse0
- Direction
- no significant effectse0
- Qualifier
- 75 and 300 Gye0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Gamma irradiation of red capsicums (cv. Five Star) at 75 and 300 Gy had no significant effects on the carotene level of unstored red capsicums or red capsicums stored at 5°C for 3 wk”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation at 75 or 300 Gy did not significantly affect carotene in red capsicums stored at 5°C for three weeks.
- Taxon
- red capsicumse0
- Material
- Five Stare0
- Treatment
- Gamma irradiatione0
- Outcome
- carotene levele0
- Direction
- no significant effectse0
- Qualifier
- stored at 5°C for 3 wke0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Gamma irradiation of red capsicums (cv. Five Star) at 75 and 300 Gy had no significant effects on the carotene level of unstored red capsicums or red capsicums stored at 5°C for 3 wk”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation at 75, 300 or 600 Gy did not significantly affect mango carotene content.
- Taxon
- mangos
Mangifera indicae0 - Material
- Kensington Pridee0
- Treatment
- Gamma irradiatione0
- Outcome
- carotene contente0
- Direction
- no significant effectse0
- Qualifier
- 75, 300 and 600 Gye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Gamma irradiation of mangos (cv. Kensington Pride) at 75, 300 and 600 Gy had no significant effects on the carotene content”
Claim · model-written summary
Changed irradiation conditions produced slightly higher carotene levels than normal ambient irradiation.
- Taxon
- mangos
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- Altering the conditions of irradiation (lower temperature, nitrogen atmosphere, lower dose rate)e0
- Outcome
- carotene levelse0
- Direction
- slightly highere0
- Comparator
- irradiation under normal ambient conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Altering the conditions of irradiation (lower temperature, nitrogen atmosphere, lower dose rate) resulted in slightly higher carotene levels than those associated with irradiation under normal ambient conditions”
t0“Mangos and Red Capsicums”
The same questions in other papers
radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.