Abstract
AbstractOlive oil is the most important product of olive fruits with worldwide consumption, particularly in Mediterranean countries. Olive oil is generally extracted mechanically from the olive fruits. Some biotic and abiotic factors may affect the quality of oil extracted from olive fruit. Contamination with fungi during growth period in the garden or during the conservation of the harvested crop under storage condition may leave negative effects on the quality of olive oil. However, there is no data available on the effects of fungal infections on qualitative properties of olive oil in Iran. In the present study effects of several fungal groups previously isolated from rotten olive fruit in olive orchards including Alternaria alternata, Fusarium nygamai, Aspergillus ochraceus, Arthrinium phaeospermum, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aureobasidium pullulans, Epicoccum nigrum, Penicillium expansum, Truncatella angustata, Trichothecium roseum and Trichoderma harzianum were evaluated on some qualitative properties of olive oil, under laboratory condition on two olive cultivars (Zard & Roghani). For this purpose fresh and healthy fruits of olive, were surface sterilisation with 96% ethanol and rinsed with sterile water and then inoculated with each of the fungal groups separately using spore suspension (106 ml−1). The experiment was carried out in two replicates for each treatment (fungal isolates). The results of this study revealed that fungal infection caused significant increase in the extracted oil acidity and peroxide values. However, there was no significant difference in the acidity and peroxide values among different treatments (fungal isolates).Keywords: olive oilqualityacidityperoxide
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Fungal infection significantly increased acidity of oil extracted from olive fruit.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- fungal infectione0
- Outcome
- extracted oil aciditye0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fungal infection caused significant increase in the extracted oil acidity and peroxide values”
t0“olive fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungal infection significantly increased peroxide values of oil extracted from olive fruit.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- fungal infectione0
- Outcome
- peroxide valuese0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fungal infection caused significant increase in the extracted oil acidity and peroxide values”
t0“olive fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Oil acidity did not differ significantly among fungal isolates.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Outcome
- aciditye0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- different treatments (fungal isolates)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there was no significant difference in the acidity and peroxide values among different treatments (fungal isolates)”
t0“olive fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Oil peroxide values did not differ significantly among fungal isolates.
- Taxon
- olive
Olea europaeat0 - Outcome
- peroxide valuese0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- different treatments (fungal isolates)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there was no significant difference in the acidity and peroxide values among different treatments (fungal isolates)”
t0“olive fruit”
The same questions in other papers
infection · molecular: metabolites · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
infection · quality: sugar starch · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.