Paper · 1987 · Agronomy Journal

Growth and Productivity of Four Corn Hybrids as Affected by Tillage1

T. C. Kaspar; T. M. Crosbie; R. M. Cruse; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Conservation‐tillage systems produce different soil environments for corn ( Zea mays L.) growth and development than do intensive tillage systems. Development of corn hybrids specifically adapted to conservation‐tillage environments may be one way to increase and stabilize grain yield. A 2‐yr field study on a Typic Haplaquolls near Ames, IA, with four hybrids and three tillage systems (no‐till, disk, and moldboard plow) was conducted to examine the effects of tillage systems, hybrids, and their interactions on shoot and root dry weights, leaf development, mature‐plant height, final plant stand, and grain yield. Moldboard plowing or disking increased vegetative growth relative to no‐till. Hybrids responded differently to the three tillage systems only during vegetative growth. Hybrids 2 and 3 had greater increases in shoot growth in response to moldboard plowing than to disking. Hybrid 3 also had a greater increase in root dry weight and leaf stage with moldboard plowing than with disking. Response to tillage for mature‐plant measurements differed between years but not between hybrids. No‐till plots had shorter mature plant heights (1.87 m) and lower grain yields (6.98 Mg ha −1 ) than moldboard‐plowed plots (1.96 m; 8.34 Mg ha −1 ) only in 1982. Grain moistures of no‐till plots averaged over years were 28 g kg −1 greater than those of moldboard‐plowed plots. Results of this study indicate that during vegetative growth, corn hybrids respond differently to tillage systems. Further evidence of hybrid ✕ tillage interactions, however, is needed to justify development of corn hybrids adapted to specific tillage systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard plowing or disking increased vegetative growth relative to no-till.

Treatment
Moldboard plowing or diskinge1
Outcome
vegetative growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
no‐tille1
Setting
Ames, IAe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moldboard plowing or disking increased vegetative growth relative to no‐till”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–704 · show in text ↑
e3

“near Ames, IA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–351 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn hybrids responded differently to the three tillage systems during vegetative growth.

Material
Hybridse2
Treatment
three tillage systemse2
Outcome
vegetative growthe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e2

“Hybrids responded differently to the three tillage systems only during vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids 2 and 3 had greater increases in shoot growth with moldboard plowing than with disking.

Material
Hybrids 2 and 3e3
Treatment
moldboard plowinge3
Outcome
shoot growthe3
Direction
greater increasese3
Comparator
diskinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e3

“Hybrids 2 and 3 had greater increases in shoot growth in response to moldboard plowing than to disking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid 3 had a greater increase in root dry weight and leaf stage with moldboard plowing than with disking.

Material
Hybrid 3e4
Treatment
moldboard plowinge4
Outcome
root dry weight and leaf stagee4
Direction
greater increasee4
Comparator
diskinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e4

“Hybrid 3 also had a greater increase in root dry weight and leaf stage with moldboard plowing than with disking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1011 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Response to tillage for mature-plant measurements differed between years but not between hybrids.

Treatment
tillagee5
Outcome
mature‐plant measurementse5
Direction
differede5
Qualifier
between years but not between hybridse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e5

“Response to tillage for mature‐plant measurements differed between years but not between hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till plots had shorter mature plant heights (1.87 m) than moldboard-plowed plots, only in 1982.

Treatment
no‐tille6
Outcome
mature plant heightse6
Direction
shortere6
Value
1.87 me6
Qualifier
only in 1982e6
Comparator
moldboard‐plowed plotse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e6

“No‐till plots had shorter mature plant heights (1.87 m) and lower grain yields (6.98 Mg ha −1 ) than moldboard‐plowed plots (1.96 m; 8.34 Mg ha −1 ) only in 1982”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till plots had lower grain yields than moldboard-plowed plots, only in 1982.

Treatment
no‐tille6
Outcome
grain yieldse6
Direction
lowere6
Value
6.98 Mg ha −1e6
Qualifier
only in 1982e6
Comparator
moldboard‐plowed plotse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e6

“No‐till plots had shorter mature plant heights (1.87 m) and lower grain yields (6.98 Mg ha −1 ) than moldboard‐plowed plots (1.96 m; 8.34 Mg ha −1 ) only in 1982”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain moisture of no-till plots averaged over years was 28 g kg-1 greater than in moldboard-plowed plots.

Treatment
no‐tille7
Outcome
Grain moisturese7
Direction
greatere7
Value
28 g kg −1e7
Qualifier
averaged over yearse7
Comparator
moldboard‐plowed plotse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn Hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain moistures of no‐till plots averaged over years were 28 g kg −1 greater than those of moldboard‐plowed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1387 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.