Paper · 2011 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

The Inoculation Method Affects Colonization and Performance of Bacterial Inoculant Strains in the Phytoremediation of Soil Contaminated with Diesel Oil

Muhammad Afzal; Sohail Yousaf; Thomas G. Reichenauer; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
181
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants in combination with microorganisms can remediate soils, which are contaminated with organic pollutants such as petroleum hydrocarbons. Inoculation of plants with degrading bacteria is one approach to improve remediation processes, but is often not successful due to the competition with resident microorganisms. It is therefore of high importance to address the persistence and colonization behavior of inoculant strains. The objective of this study was to determine whether the inoculation method (seed imbibement and soil inoculation) influences bacterial colonization, plant growth promotion and hydrocarbon degradation. Italian ryegrass was grown in non-sterilized soil polluted with diesel and inoculated with different alkane-degrading strains Pantoea sp. ITSI10, Pantoea sp. BTRH79 and Pseudomonas sp. MixRI75 individually as well as in combination. Inoculation generally had a beneficial effect on plant biomass production and hydrocarbon degradation, however, strains inoculated in soil performed better than applied by seed imbibement. Performance correlated with the colonization efficiency of the inoculated strains. The highest hydrocarbon degradation was observed in the treatment, in which all three strains were inoculated in combination into soil. Our study revealed that besides the degradation potential and competitive ability of inoculant strains the inoculation method plays an important role in determining the success of microbial inoculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased Italian ryegrass biomass production.

Taxon
Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume1
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Pantoea sp. ITSI10Pantoea sp. ITSI10e0symbiont
Outcome
plant biomass productione0
Direction
beneficial effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pantoea sp. ITSI10
Pantoea sp. ITSI10 · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Agricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Italian ryegrass was grown in non-sterilized soil polluted with diesel and inoculated with different alkane-degrading strains Pantoea sp. ITSI10, Pantoea sp. BTRH79 and Pseudomonas sp. MixRI75 individually as well as in combination. Inoculation generally had a beneficial effect on plant biomass production and hydrocarbon degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“Italian ryegrass was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation improved hydrocarbon degradation in soil with Italian ryegrass.

Taxon
Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume1
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
hydrocarbon degradatione0
Direction
beneficial effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation generally had a beneficial effect on plant biomass production and hydrocarbon degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“Italian ryegrass was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil inoculation performed better than seed imbibement.

Taxon
Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume1
Treatment
inoculated in soile0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
seed imbibemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains inoculated in soil performed better than applied by seed imbibement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1051 · show in text ↑
e1

“Italian ryegrass was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–657 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculant performance correlated with colonization efficiency.

Taxon
Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume1
Treatment
inoculated strainse0
Outcome
Performancee0
Qualifier
colonization efficiency of the inoculated strainse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Performance correlated with the colonization efficiency of the inoculated strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1134 · show in text ↑
e1

“Italian ryegrass was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining all three strains in soil produced the highest hydrocarbon degradation.

Taxon
Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume1
Treatment
all three strains were inoculated in combination into soile0
Outcome
hydrocarbon degradatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest hydrocarbon degradation was observed in the treatment, in which all three strains were inoculated in combination into soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1270 · show in text ↑
e1

“Italian ryegrass was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–657 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculation method was interpreted as important for microbial inoculation success.

Taxon
Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume1
Treatment
inoculation methode0
Outcome
success of microbial inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“besides the degradation potential and competitive ability of inoculant strains the inoculation method plays an important role in determining the success of microbial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1473 · show in text ↑
e1

“Italian ryegrass was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–657 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.