Paper · 2010 · Plant Disease

First Report of Bulb Disease of Onion Caused by Pantoea ananatis in New York

E. A. Carr; J. M. Bonasera; A. M. Zaid; et al.

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In winter 2007, disease symptoms were observed in stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006. Similar symptoms were observed in bulbs produced in 2007, 2008, and 2009. Symptoms were associated with one to three bulb scales near the midsection. Infected scales were light brown to brown, not macerated, and lacking foul odors typical of onion bulbs infected with Burkholderia cepacia. Onion grower-packers located in Orange County, NY were concerned that onion lots were rejected following grading by inspectors who cut bulbs to check market quality. Extent of the problem statewide is not currently clear. Isolation attempts were made from symptomatic tissues onto nutrient agar plates (3), with incubation for 24 h at 26 to 28°C, and PA-20 (2), a semiselective medium for the isolation of Pantoea ananatis, with similar incubation for 4 to 6 days. Most strains that grew on PA-20 were gram negative and yellow pigmented with dark centers. Isolated strains were tentatively identified as P. ananatis on the basis of growth on PA-20, a positive indole and negative oxidase test, positive tests for catalase, fermentation of glucose, Voges-Proskauer, and citrate utilization; negative for phenylalanine deaminase, urease, nitrate reductase, methyl red tests, and hypersensitive response induction in tobacco. The BIOLOG (Hayward, CA) system indicated that all presumptive strains of P. ananatis utilized d-mannose, d-cellobiose, d-melibiose, l-inositol, d-arabinose, cellulose, glycerol, d-arabitol, and sucrose, but not glycogen, N-acetyl-d-galactosamine, malonic acid, l-fucose, or xylitol. Strains of P. ananatis recovered from diseased onions in Georgia (GA) (1) were included in all tests as positive controls. We used PCR primers suggested by R. D. Gitaitis (University of Georgia): PanITS1 (5′-GTC TGA TAG AAA GAT AAA GAC-3′) and AS2b (5′-TTC ATA TCA CCT TAC CGG CGC-3′). Together, they amplify the 16S-23S rDNA internal transcribed spacer region of 398 bp; the nucleotide sequences of six NY and three GA strains are identical to each other and 99.3% identical to P. ananatis LMG 20103 (GenBank CP001875) and 93.3% identical to P. stewartii (AJ311838). Pathogenicity tests were done in onion leaves. For inoculation, strains were grown on nutrient agar for 24 h and bacterial suspensions of ~10 8 CFU/ml were prepared in sterile water. Tips of healthy, greenhouse-grown onion leaves were cut and inoculum was applied to the cut surfaces with cotton swabs. Plants were incubated in a greenhouse for up to 2 weeks. Plants mock inoculated with water were symptomless. Bacteria were recovered from all lesions induced by artificial inoculation with the presumptive strains of P. ananatis. Recovered bacteria had characteristics of P. ananatis. Pathogenic strains from NY and GA produced off-white lesions that extended the length of the leaf, which was consistent with previous studies of the pathogenicity of P. ananatis (1). On the basis of microbiological and molecular analyses and pathogenicity tests, 14 NY strains, each isolated from a different diseased bulb, were identified as P. ananatis. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of P. ananatis causing a disease of onion in New York. References: (1) R. D. Gitaitis et al. USA Crop Prot. 21:983, 2002. (2) T. Goszczynska et al. J. Microbiol. Methods. 64:22, 2006. (3) N. W. Shaad et al, eds. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. 3rd ed. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, 2000.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb disease of onion caused by Pantoea ananatis was first reported in New York.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Interactor
Pantoea ananatisPantoea ananatist0pathogen
Outcome
Bulb Diseaset0
Setting
New Yorkt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“First Report of Bulb Disease of Onion Caused by Pantoea ananatis in New York”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen New York isolates, each from a different diseased bulb, were identified as P. ananatis.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Material
14 NY strainse2
Interactor
P. ananatisPantoea ananatise2pathogen
Outcome
identified as P. ananatise2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“On the basis of microbiological and molecular analyses and pathogenicity tests, 14 NY strains, each isolated from a different diseased bulb, were identified as P. ananatis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2957–3128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial inoculation with presumptive P. ananatis strains produced off-white lesions on onion leaves, unlike mock inoculation with water.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae3
Treatment
artificial inoculatione4
Interactor
P. ananatisPantoea ananatise4pathogen
Outcome
off-white lesionse5
Comparator
mock inoculated with watere6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Pathogenicity tests were done in onion leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2232 · show in text ↑
e4

“Bacteria were recovered from all lesions induced by artificial inoculation with the presumptive strains of P. ananatis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2599–2717 · show in text ↑
e5

“Pathogenic strains from NY and GA produced off-white lesions that extended the length of the leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2774–2871 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plants mock inoculated with water were symptomless”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2547–2597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria were recovered from all lesions induced by artificial inoculation on onion leaves.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae3
Treatment
artificial inoculatione4
Interactor
P. ananatisPantoea ananatise4pathogen
Outcome
Bacteria were recovered from all lesionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Pathogenicity tests were done in onion leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2232 · show in text ↑
e4

“Bacteria were recovered from all lesions induced by artificial inoculation with the presumptive strains of P. ananatis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2599–2717 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovered bacteria had characteristics of P. ananatis.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae3
Interactor
P. ananatisPantoea ananatise7pathogen
Outcome
characteristics of P. ananatise7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Pathogenicity tests were done in onion leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2232 · show in text ↑
e7

“Recovered bacteria had characteristics of P. ananatis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2719–2772 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nucleotide sequences of six NY and three GA strains were identical to each other and 99.3% identical to P. ananatis LMG 20103.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Interactor
P. ananatisPantoea ananatise5pathogen
Outcome
nucleotide sequencese5
Value
99.3%e5
Comparator
P. ananatis LMG 20103e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“the nucleotide sequences of six NY and three GA strains are identical to each other and 99.3% identical to P. ananatis LMG 20103”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1991–2119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nucleotide sequences of the NY and GA strains were 93.3% identical to P. stewartii.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Outcome
nucleotide sequencese1
Value
93.3%e2
Comparator
P. stewartiie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“the nucleotide sequences of six NY and three GA strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1991–2046 · show in text ↑
e2

“93.3% identical to P. stewartii (AJ311838)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2143–2185 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR primers PanITS1 and AS2b amplified a 398 bp 16S-23S rDNA internal transcribed spacer region of the isolates.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Outcome
amplify the 16S-23S rDNA internal transcribed spacer regione1
Value
398 bpe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Together, they amplify the 16S-23S rDNA internal transcribed spacer region of 398 bp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–1989 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presumptive P. ananatis strains utilized d-mannose, d-cellobiose and d-melibiose in BIOLOG tests.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Interactor
P. ananatisPantoea ananatise6pathogen
Outcome
d-mannose, d-cellobiose, d-melibiosee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“all presumptive strains of P. ananatis utilized d-mannose, d-cellobiose, d-melibiose, l-inositol, d-arabinose, cellulose, glycerol, d-arabitol, and sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presumptive P. ananatis strains utilized l-inositol, d-arabinose and cellulose in BIOLOG tests.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Interactor
P. ananatisPantoea ananatise6pathogen
Outcome
l-inositol, d-arabinose, cellulosee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“all presumptive strains of P. ananatis utilized d-mannose, d-cellobiose, d-melibiose, l-inositol, d-arabinose, cellulose, glycerol, d-arabitol, and sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presumptive P. ananatis strains utilized glycerol, d-arabitol and sucrose in BIOLOG tests.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Interactor
P. ananatisPantoea ananatise6pathogen
Outcome
glycerol, d-arabitol, and sucrosee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“all presumptive strains of P. ananatis utilized d-mannose, d-cellobiose, d-melibiose, l-inositol, d-arabinose, cellulose, glycerol, d-arabitol, and sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presumptive P. ananatis strains did not utilize glycogen, N-acetyl-d-galactosamine or malonic acid in BIOLOG tests.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Outcome
glycogen, N-acetyl-d-galactosamine, malonic acide7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
e7

“but not glycogen, N-acetyl-d-galactosamine, malonic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1595 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presumptive P. ananatis strains did not utilize l-fucose or xylitol in BIOLOG tests.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Outcome
l-fucose, or xylitole7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stored yellow onion bulbs (Allium cepa) grown in New York (NY) in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–120 · show in text ↑
e7

“but not glycogen, N-acetyl-d-galactosamine, malonic acid, l-fucose, or xylitol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1617 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Pantoea ananatis · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.