Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Boron‐and‐salt interactions in wheat are affected by boron supply

Monika A. Wimmer; Heiner E. Goldbach

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Plants in arid or semiarid areas often experience simultaneous salt and boron (B) stress. Interactive effects on stress responses have been clearly established, but results are inconsistent and variably indicate antagonistic or synergistic interactions even within the same plant species. In this study, five differently B‐ and salt‐resistant wheat genotypes were grown hydroponically at low and high B supply. The effect of increasing NaCl salinity on plant growth, boron uptake rates, shoot B concentrations, and transpiration was determined under both B regimes. The interactive effect of salt and B was different under low and high B supply. Boron‐uptake rates were reduced with increasing salt concentration only under high B supply, and reductions correlated significantly with decreases in leaf area and shoot B concentrations. Under low B supply, however, salt‐induced effects on B‐uptake rates were variable and not significantly correlated with leaf‐area reductions. These results suggest that under high B supply, when B uptake is predominantly passive by diffusion or channel‐mediated via aquaporins, transpiration‐driven water flow is the dominant factor for B accumulation in arial plant parts. Under low B supply, when a significant portion of B can be taken up via active pathways, transpiration is not the decisive factor for B accumulation. Under these conditions, the salt sensitivity of a genotype is a modifying factor of salt–B interactions, because salt‐induced growth inhibition can result in a concentration effect, offset the reduction of B‐uptake rates, and result in increased shoot B concentrations. Contradictory reports on the nature of salt–B interactions might in part be related to low levels of B supply chosen as control treatments and concomittant differences in predominant B‐uptake pathways.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt and boron interacted differently under low and high boron supply.

Outcome
interactive effect of salt and Be0
Qualifier
different under low and high B supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interactive effect of salt and B was different under low and high B supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–653 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt reduced boron uptake rates only under high boron supply.

Treatment
increasing salt concentratione0
Outcome
Boron‐uptake ratese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
only under high B supplye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boron‐uptake rates were reduced with increasing salt concentration only under high B supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–367 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high boron supply, lower boron uptake correlated with reduced leaf area.

Organ / stage
leaf areae0
Outcome
Boron‐uptake ratese1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
decreases in leaf areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reductions correlated significantly with decreases in leaf area and shoot B concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boron‐uptake rates were reduced with increasing salt concentration only under high B supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–746 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–367 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high boron supply, lower boron uptake correlated with lower shoot boron concentrations.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
Boron‐uptake ratese1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
decreases in leaf area and shoot B concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reductions correlated significantly with decreases in leaf area and shoot B concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boron‐uptake rates were reduced with increasing salt concentration only under high B supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–746 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–367 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low boron supply, salt effects on boron uptake varied.

Outcome
B‐uptake ratese0
Qualifier
Under low B supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under low B supply, however, salt‐induced effects on B‐uptake rates were variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–925 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–367 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low boron supply, boron uptake and leaf area reductions were not significantly correlated.

Organ / stage
leaf‐areae0
Outcome
B‐uptake ratese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“not significantly correlated with leaf‐area reductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under low B supply, however, salt‐induced effects on B‐uptake rates were variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–925 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–367 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high boron supply, transpiration-driven water flow was inferred to dominate boron accumulation in aerial parts.

Outcome
B accumulation in arial plant partse0
Qualifier
transpiration‐driven water flowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under high B supply, when B uptake is predominantly passive by diffusion or channel‐mediated via aquaporins, transpiration‐driven water flow is the dominant factor for B accumulation in arial plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–367 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low boron supply, transpiration was inferred not to decide boron accumulation.

Outcome
B accumulatione0
Qualifier
transpiration is not the decisive factore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under low B supply, when a significant portion of B can be taken up via active pathways, transpiration is not the decisive factor for B accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1366 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–367 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low boron supply, genotype salt sensitivity modified salt–boron interactions.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
salt–B interactionse0
Qualifier
salt‐induced growth inhibition can result in a concentration effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the salt sensitivity of a genotype is a modifying factor of salt–B interactions, because salt‐induced growth inhibition can result in a concentration effect, offset the reduction of B‐uptake rates, and result in increased shoot B concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1636 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–367 · show in text ↑

salinity · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 19 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.