Paper · 2008 · Journal of Food Science

Effect of Natural Antibrowning Agents on Color and Related Enzymes in Fresh‐Cut Fuji Apples as an Alternative to the Use of Ascorbic Acid

M.A. Rojas‐Graü; R. Soliva‐Fortuny; O. Martín‐Belloso

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
110
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Polyphenoloxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) were evaluated in fresh-cut Fuji apple slices and the effeet of the individual or combined use of ascorbic acid, 4-hexylresorcinol, N-acetylcysteine, and glutathione on their respective activities was determined. Additionally, color changes during storage at 4 degrees C were measured throughout 14 d of storage. PPO activity increased with storage time and was inhibited by the individual use of N-acetylcysteine and glutathione. POD activity in the apple slices was effectively inhibited by the combined use of ascorbic acid with any of the other antibrowning agents. On the other hand, an individual treatment with 1% N-acetylcysteine helped in maintaining the color of fresh-cut apples during 14 d of storage, whereas the use of ascorbic acid was not enough to prevent color deterioration of the apple slices from the 1st day of storage. The results obtained corroborated the effectiveness of other natural antibrowning agents over the traditional use of ascorbic acid in the control of the enzymatic browning in the fresh-cut fruit industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPO activity increased with apple storage time.

Taxon
Fuji Applest0
Organ / stage
storage timee0
Outcome
PPO activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“PPO activity increased with storage time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fuji Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-acetylcysteine inhibited apple PPO activity.

Taxon
Fuji Applest0
Treatment
N-acetylcysteinee0
Outcome
PPO activitye0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PPO activity increased with storage time and was inhibited by the individual use of N-acetylcysteine and glutathione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fuji Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutathione inhibited apple PPO activity.

Taxon
Fuji Applest0
Treatment
glutathionee0
Outcome
PPO activitye0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PPO activity increased with storage time and was inhibited by the individual use of N-acetylcysteine and glutathione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fuji Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid combined with other antibrowning agents inhibited POD activity.

Treatment
combined use of ascorbic acid with any of the other antibrowning agentse0
Outcome
POD activitye0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POD activity in the apple slices was effectively inhibited by the combined use of ascorbic acid with any of the other antibrowning agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent N-acetylcysteine maintained apple color for 14 days.

Treatment
1% N-acetylcysteinee0
Outcome
color of fresh-cut applese0
Qualifier
during 14 d of storagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an individual treatment with 1% N-acetylcysteine helped in maintaining the color of fresh-cut apples during 14 d of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid failed to prevent apple color deterioration from storage day one.

Treatment
ascorbic acide0
Outcome
color deterioratione0
Direction
not enough to prevente0
Qualifier
from the 1st day of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of ascorbic acid was not enough to prevent color deterioration of the apple slices from the 1st day of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–885 · show in text ↑

ascorbic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

ascorbic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.