Paper · 1980 · Physiologia Plantarum

Promotion of flowering in the Pinaceae by gibberellins

N. C. WHEELER; R. L. WAMPLE; R. P. PHARIS

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Significant female flowering of 6‐ to 11‐year‐old seedlings and grafted ramets of sexually mature scions of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl.) was promoted by both topical and spray applications of a gibberellin (GA) A 4/7 mixture (1.6 to c . 5 mg per plant in total) during that period (June to September) when sexual differentiation of lateral primordia would be expected to take place. Girdling was used in most experiments to enhance the GA 4/7 effect, as was the auxin, naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). Average frequency of flowering branches on treated plants over all experiments ranged from 27 to 59% (control ranged from 0 to 36%) and average number of female strobili was increased from 2‐ to 6‐fold by growth regulator treatment, relative to controls. Within an experiment, clonal or family frequency of flowering for treated plants ranged from 11 to 67% (controls were 0 to 28%), and number of female strobili was increased from 2‐ to 14‐fold by growth regulator treatment, relative to controls. Movement of the flowering stimulus from the point of application was apparent in several experiments, the response in adjacent branches being correlated positively with increasing dosage of GA 4/7 . Significant male flowering occurred only in one experiment, girdling and GA 4/7 treatment being promotive factors. The use of spray applications of GA 4/7 + NAA is warranted to induce early and enhanced flowering in lodgepole pine seedlings and vegetative propagules for genetic improvement programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 4/7 applications promoted female flowering in lodgepole pine.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae7
Treatment
gibberellin (GA) A 4/7 mixturee0
Outcome
female floweringe6
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“grafted ramets of sexually mature scions of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“was promoted by both topical and spray applications of a gibberellin (GA) A 4/7 mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–244 · show in text ↑
e6

“Significant female flowering of 6‐ to 11‐year‐old seedlings and grafted ramets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“control ranged from 0 to 36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering branch frequency on GA 4/7-treated lodgepole pine plants was higher than on controls, at 27 to 59%.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae7
Treatment
gibberellin (GA) A 4/7 mixturee0
Outcome
Average frequency of flowering branchese1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
27 to 59%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“grafted ramets of sexually mature scions of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“was promoted by both topical and spray applications of a gibberellin (GA) A 4/7 mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average frequency of flowering branches on treated plants over all experiments ranged from 27 to 59% (control ranged from 0 to 36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average number of female strobili increased 2- to 6-fold with growth regulator treatment compared with controls.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae7
Treatment
growth regulator treatmente2
Outcome
average number of female strobilie2
Direction
increasede2
Value
2‐ to 6‐folde2
Comparator
controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“grafted ramets of sexually mature scions of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–156 · show in text ↑
e2

“average number of female strobili was increased from 2‐ to 6‐fold by growth regulator treatment, relative to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clonal or family frequency of flowering was higher in treated lodgepole pine than in controls, at 11 to 67%.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae7
Treatment
gibberellin (GA) A 4/7 mixturee0
Outcome
clonal or family frequency of floweringe3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
11 to 67%e3
Comparator
controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“grafted ramets of sexually mature scions of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“was promoted by both topical and spray applications of a gibberellin (GA) A 4/7 mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–244 · show in text ↑
e3

“Within an experiment, clonal or family frequency of flowering for treated plants ranged from 11 to 67% (controls were 0 to 28%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of female strobili increased 2- to 14-fold with growth regulator treatment compared with controls within an experiment.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae7
Treatment
growth regulator treatmente3
Outcome
number of female strobilie3
Direction
increasede3
Value
2‐ to 14‐folde3
Comparator
controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“grafted ramets of sexually mature scions of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–156 · show in text ↑
e3

“number of female strobili was increased from 2‐ to 14‐fold by growth regulator treatment, relative to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1017 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Response in adjacent branches was positively correlated with increasing GA 4/7 dosage.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae7
Treatment
dosage of GA 4/7e4
Outcome
response in adjacent branchese4
Direction
correlated positivelye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“grafted ramets of sexually mature scions of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–156 · show in text ↑
e4

“the response in adjacent branches being correlated positively with increasing dosage of GA 4/7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1215 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Male flowering occurred significantly in only one experiment, with girdling and GA 4/7 treatment as promoting factors.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae7
Treatment
GA 4/7 treatmente5
Outcome
male floweringe5
Direction
promotivee5
Qualifier
only in one experimente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“grafted ramets of sexually mature scions of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–156 · show in text ↑
e5

“Significant male flowering occurred only in one experiment, girdling and GA 4/7 treatment being promotive factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1331 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Spray applications of GA 4/7 + NAA are warranted to induce early and enhanced flowering in lodgepole pine for genetic improvement programs.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae6
Treatment
spray applications of GA 4/7 + NAAe6
Outcome
early and enhanced floweringe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The use of spray applications of GA 4/7 + NAA is warranted to induce early and enhanced flowering in lodgepole pine seedlings and vegetative propagules for genetic improvement programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1517 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.