Paper · 1970 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Comparative economic analysis of borrwer and non-borrower Boro rice farmers in some selected sites of Mymensingh District

MSK Sarkar; MR Hasan; MA Feardous; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study has been conducted to examine the differences in input use, costs and returns of the borrower and non-borrower rice farmers. One hundred samples from four villages under Tiishal Upazila of Mymensingh district were selected for the study. The study reveals that borrower farmers used more inputs and attained more returns through higher yield than their counterparts. The yields of rice per hectare were 5260.80 kg and 4177.34 kg for the borrower and non-borrower farmers, respectively. The gross returns and net returns were Tk. 41699.03 and Tk. 4475.64, respectively, for the non-borrower farmers and Tk. 51589.53. and Tk. 8821.68, respectively, for borrower farmers. The undiscounted BCRs were 1.73 and 1.12 in case of non-borrower farmers and 1.74 and 1.21 for the borrower ones. The study further reveals that credit could be judged as a vital player to increase higher yield through utilization of necessary production inputs. Keywords: Borrower farmer; non-borrower farmer; cost and return. DOI: 10.3329/bjar.v35i1.5867Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 35(1) : 65-76, March 2010

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Borrower farmers used more inputs than non-borrowers.

Taxon
Boro ricet0
Outcome
more inputse0
Comparator
their counterpartse0

Verbatim

t0

“Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“borrower farmers used more inputs and attained more returns through higher yield than their counterparts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Borrower farmers had higher rice yield than non-borrowers: 5260.80 kg versus 4177.34 kg per hectare.

Taxon
Boro ricet0
Outcome
yields of rice per hectaree0
Value
5260.80 kge0
Qualifier
4177.34 kge0
Comparator
non-borrower farmerse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yields of rice per hectare were 5260.80 kg and 4177.34 kg for the borrower and non-borrower farmers, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Borrower farmers had higher gross returns than non-borrowers.

Taxon
Boro ricet0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Value
Tk. 51589.53e0
Qualifier
Tk. 41699.03e0
Comparator
non-borrower farmerse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The gross returns and net returns were Tk. 41699.03 and Tk. 4475.64, respectively, for the non-borrower farmers and Tk. 51589.53. and Tk. 8821.68, respectively, for borrower farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–686 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Borrower farmers had higher net returns than non-borrowers.

Taxon
Boro ricet0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
Tk. 8821.68e0
Qualifier
Tk. 4475.64e0
Comparator
non-borrower farmerse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“The gross returns and net returns were Tk. 41699.03 and Tk. 4475.64, respectively, for the non-borrower farmers and Tk. 51589.53. and Tk. 8821.68, respectively, for borrower farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–686 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Credit was judged important for raising yield through input use.

Taxon
Boro ricet0
Treatment
credite0
Outcome
increase higher yielde0

Verbatim

t0

“Boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“credit could be judged as a vital player to increase higher yield through utilization of necessary production inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–948 · show in text ↑