Paper · 2003 · Plant Breeding

Hybrid seed production in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) following the induction of male sterility by gibberellic acid

H. Baydar; O. Y. Gökmen; W. Friedt

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The objective of the present research was to develop an effective and practical method for hybrid seed production in safflower, by inducing male sterility with gibberellic acid (GA 3 ). Seeds of the spiny line ‘5‐154’ and the non‐spiny variety ‘Dincer 5‐118’ were sown in alternate rows and the plants of the non‐spiny female variety were exposed to various concentrations of GA 3 for male sterility induction. Three successive sprays (75, 82 and 89 days after sowing) of 100 p.p.m. of GA 3 to safflower buds of <0.5 cm diameter at a pre‐meiotic interphase stage resulted in reduced pollen viability from 81.6‐6.7% compared with the control. An average hybrid seed percentage of 80.7% (87.5% in the secondary heads), identified by the use of the spiny‐capitulum marker variety ‘5‐154′, was obtained. The GA 3 treatments did not significantly affect the production of viable achenes. The results showed that GA 3 could be successfully used as a chemical hybridizing agent in hybrid safflower production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three successive sprays of 100 p.p.m. GA3 on safflower buds reduced pollen viability from 81.6 to 6.7% compared with the control.

Organ / stage
budse1
Treatment
Three successive sprays (75, 82 and 89 days after sowing) of 100 p.p.m. of GA 3e1
Outcome
pollen viabilitye1
Direction
reducede1
Value
81.6‐6.7%e1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Three successive sprays (75, 82 and 89 days after sowing) of 100 p.p.m. of GA 3 to safflower buds of <0.5 cm diameter at a pre‐meiotic interphase stage resulted in reduced pollen viability from 81.6‐6.7% compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–649 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An average hybrid seed percentage of 80.7% was obtained in GA3-treated safflower.

Outcome
hybrid seed percentagee1
Value
80.7%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“An average hybrid seed percentage of 80.7% (87.5% in the secondary heads)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–724 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hybrid seed percentage in the secondary heads of safflower was 87.5%.

Organ / stage
secondary headse1
Outcome
hybrid seed percentagee1
Value
87.5%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“An average hybrid seed percentage of 80.7% (87.5% in the secondary heads)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The GA3 treatments did not significantly affect the production of viable achenes in safflower.

Treatment
GA 3 treatmentse1
Outcome
production of viable achenese1
Direction
did not significantly affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“The GA 3 treatments did not significantly affect the production of viable achenes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–890 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that GA3 could be successfully used as a chemical hybridizing agent in hybrid safflower production.

Treatment
GA 3e1
Outcome
chemical hybridizing agente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“GA 3 could be successfully used as a chemical hybridizing agent in hybrid safflower production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1010 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.