Abstract
Synopsis The resistance of Cimarron and Blackhull was dominant to the shatter susceptibility of Wichita. Blackhull and Wichita differed by at least two major factor pairs while multigenic differences existed between Cimarron and Wichita. Heritability estimates are presented. A correlation of .66 was obtained between field and laboratory shattering determinations.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Shattering resistance of Cimarron was dominant over Wichita susceptibility.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Cimarrone0
- Outcome
- resistancee0
- Direction
- dominante0
- Comparator
- Wichitae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The resistance of Cimarron and Blackhull was dominant to the shatter susceptibility of Wichita.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Shattering resistance of Blackhull was dominant over Wichita susceptibility.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Blackhulle0
- Outcome
- resistancee0
- Direction
- dominante0
- Comparator
- Wichitae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The resistance of Cimarron and Blackhull was dominant to the shatter susceptibility of Wichita.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Blackhull and Wichita differed by at least two major factor pairs for shattering.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Blackhulle0
- Outcome
- differed by at least two major factor pairse0
- Value
- at least two major factor pairse0
- Comparator
- Wichitae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Blackhull and Wichita differed by at least two major factor pairs”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Cimarron and Wichita had multigenic differences for shattering.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Cimarrone0
- Outcome
- multigenic differencese0
- Comparator
- Wichitae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“multigenic differences existed between Cimarron and Wichita”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Field and laboratory shattering determinations correlated at .66.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- correlatione0
- Value
- .66e0
- Comparator
- laboratory shattering determinationse0
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A correlation of .66 was obtained between field and laboratory shattering determinations.”
t0“Wheat”