Paper · 2000 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Influence of additional ammonium supply on some nutritional aspects in hydroponic rose plants

H. LORENZO; M. C. CID; J. M. SIVERIO; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of an additional supply of ammonium to a nitrate containing hydroponic solution on the mineral nutrition of greenhouse rose plants ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Lambada’) has been investigated. The effect on NPK uptake, mineral contents in roots and leaves as well as nitrate reductase (NR) and glutamine synthetase (GS) activities were examined. The addition of ammonium in a nutrient solution containing nitrate produced a total nitrogen uptake increase during shoot elongation, while in the absence of ammonium, nitrate uptake was lower during shoot elongation. Adding ammonium to the hydroponics solution caused an increase of potassium uptake while ammonium absorption was constant. Phosphate uptake was always higher in combined nitrate plus ammonium treatment, likewise in this treatment the most relevant effect on plant mineral content was the increase of P concentration in the roots. In both treatments with or without NH + 4 , free nitrate was notably higher in the roots than in leaves, indicating that nitrate reduction in rose plants takes place mainly in the leaves. NR activity in the leaves was higher when ammonium was present, whereas the root GS activity was similar in both treatments. The influence of ammonium on phosphate uptake and the subsequent effects on transport of other ions and enzymatic activities are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium increased total nitrogen uptake during shoot elongation.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Organ / stage
shoot elongatione0t0
Treatment
addition of ammonium in a nutrient solution containing nitratee0t0
Outcome
total nitrogen uptakee0t0
Direction
increasee0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of ammonium in a nutrient solution containing nitrate produced a total nitrogen uptake increase during shoot elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without ammonium, nitrate uptake was lower during shoot elongation.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Organ / stage
shoot elongatione0t0
Treatment
absence of ammoniume0t0
Outcome
nitrate uptakee0t0
Direction
lowere0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“while in the absence of ammonium, nitrate uptake was lower during shoot elongation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding ammonium increased potassium uptake.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Treatment
Adding ammonium to the hydroponics solutione0t0
Outcome
potassium uptakee0t0
Direction
increasee0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Adding ammonium to the hydroponics solution caused an increase of potassium uptake while ammonium absorption was constant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium absorption stayed constant.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Outcome
ammonium absorptione0t0
Direction
constante0t0

Verbatim

e0

“ammonium absorption was constant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate uptake was higher with combined nitrate and ammonium.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Treatment
combined nitrate plus ammonium treatmente0t0
Outcome
Phosphate uptakee0t0
Direction
highere0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate uptake was always higher in combined nitrate plus ammonium treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrate and ammonium increased root P concentration.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Treatment
this treatmente0t0
Outcome
P concentration in the rootse0t0
Direction
increasee0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in this treatment the most relevant effect on plant mineral content was the increase of P concentration in the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Free nitrate was higher in roots than leaves in both treatments.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Organ / stage
rootse0t0
Outcome
free nitratee0t0
Direction
highere0t0
Comparator
leavese0t0

Verbatim

e0

“In both treatments with or without NH + 4 , free nitrate was notably higher in the roots than in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reduction in roses takes place mainly in leaves.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Organ / stage
leavese0t0
Outcome
nitrate reductione0t0

Verbatim

e0

“indicating that nitrate reduction in rose plants takes place mainly in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrate reductase activity was higher with ammonium.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Organ / stage
leavese0t0
Treatment
ammonium was presente0t0
Outcome
NR activitye0t0
Direction
highere0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“NR activity in the leaves was higher when ammonium was present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root glutamine synthetase activity was similar with and without ammonium.

Taxon
rose plantse0t0
Treatment
both treatmentse0t0
Outcome
root GS activitye0t0
Direction
similare0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“whereas the root GS activity was similar in both treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: enzyme activity · RosaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · RosaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · RosaResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.