Paper · 1998 · Weed Research

Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time

PAOLINI; S. DEL PUGLIA; PRINCIPI; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of crop genotype and sowing time on competition between safflower ( Carthamus tinctorius L.) and weeds were investigated in a 2‐year field study. Each year, safflower was grown as a pure stand and in mixture with a natural weed infestation, mostly represented by Polygonum aviculare L . , Fallopia convolvulus (L.) A. Löve and Chenopodium album L., in an additive design including weed stands grown without the crop. Grain yield reduction ranged from about 50% to 80% depending on crop genotype, and was higher under spring sowing (mid‐March) than under winter sowing (mid‐February). In general, those genotypes incurring the least yield reduction gave the greatest suppression of weed biomass. More competitive genotypes also tended to reduce the proportion of C. album in the weed biomass at harvest, particularly in 1994 (the wetter growing season). The competitive ability of the crop was mainly correlated with its biomass at early growth stages, but was not related to its grain‐yielding ability in the absence of weeds. Results showed that more competitive crops may be obtained by sowing the most competitive genotypes early. Selecting for higher competitive ability in safflower does not seem to imply a reduction in grain‐yielding ability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield reduction of safflower by weed competition ranged from about 50% to 80% depending on crop genotype.

Material
crop genotypee0
Interactor
weedst0weed
Outcome
Grain yield reductione0
Value
about 50% to 80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield reduction ranged from about 50% to 80% depending on crop genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield reduction of safflower by weeds was higher under spring sowing than under winter sowing.

Treatment
spring sowing (mid‐March)e0
Interactor
weedst0weed
Outcome
Grain yield reductione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
winter sowing (mid‐February)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield reduction ranged from about 50% to 80% depending on crop genotype, and was higher under spring sowing (mid‐March) than under winter sowing (mid‐February)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–594 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Safflower genotypes with the least yield reduction gave the greatest suppression of weed biomass.

Material
genotypes incurring the least yield reductione0
Outcome
suppression of weed biomasse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“In general, those genotypes incurring the least yield reduction gave the greatest suppression of weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–705 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More competitive safflower genotypes tended to reduce the proportion of C. album in weed biomass at harvest, particularly in 1994.

Material
More competitive genotypese0
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
proportion of C. album in the weed biomass at harveste0
Direction
reducee0
Setting
1994 (the wetter growing season)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“More competitive genotypes also tended to reduce the proportion of C. album in the weed biomass at harvest, particularly in 1994 (the wetter growing season)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–863 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competitive ability of safflower was correlated with crop biomass at early growth stages.

Organ / stage
early growth stagese0
Outcome
competitive abilitye0
Direction
higherinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The competitive ability of the crop was mainly correlated with its biomass at early growth stages, but was not related to its grain‐yielding ability in the absence of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1037 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competitive ability of safflower was not related to its grain-yielding ability in the absence of weeds.

Treatment
competitive ability of the crope0
Outcome
grain‐yielding ability in the absence of weedse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The competitive ability of the crop was mainly correlated with its biomass at early growth stages, but was not related to its grain‐yielding ability in the absence of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1037 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

More competitive safflower crops may be obtained by sowing the most competitive genotypes early.

Treatment
sowing the most competitive genotypes earlye0
Outcome
more competitive cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results showed that more competitive crops may be obtained by sowing the most competitive genotypes early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1144 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting for higher competitive ability in safflower does not seem to imply a reduction in grain-yielding ability.

Treatment
Selecting for higher competitive abilitye0
Outcome
grain‐yielding abilitye0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Selecting for higher competitive ability in safflower does not seem to imply a reduction in grain‐yielding ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1260 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.