Paper · 1989 · Crop Science

Seasonal Trends for Nonstructural Carbohydrates in Stem Bases of Defoliated Switchgrass

J. R. George; D. J. Obermann; D. D. Wolf

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Defoliation management of forage species in the northern USA is related to total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) concentrations. These energy compounds are closely related to winter survival, stand persistence, and subsequent productivity of stands. Influences of early spring defoliation on TNC concentrations of switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) during recovery growth in the humid USA have not been reported. This field study was conducted to observe influences of defoliation time and intensity on TNC concentrations during recovery growth when switchgrass was grown without or with N fertilization (120 kg N ha −1 ). The experimental site was a Webster‐Nicollet soil complex (fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Haplaquolls‐Aquic Hapludolls). Defoliation treatments at 2‐wk intervals in 1984 and 1985 consisted of early‐, mid‐, and late‐spring defoliation, each at moderate or severe intensity. Nitrogen fertilization reduced TNC concentrations for all defoliation treatments. Accumulated TNC concentrations remained lower after 3, 6, and 9 wk of recovery growth for 120 compared with 0 kg N ha −1 , but relatively little difference was observed among defoliation treatments in TNC concentrations by mid‐October. Severe defoliation at early, mid, and late spring generally contributed to lower TNC concentrations during recovery growth compared with moderate defoliation. However, TNC concentrations 6 to 8 wk or less after spring defoliation were at a relatively high concentration for most defoliation treatments, which suggests that herbage utilization in mid‐ to late‐July should not seriously weaken stands. Lower TNC concentrations in mid‐October of 1985 compared with 1984 suggest that both weather conditions and defoliation management influence TNC concentrations in stem bases of switchgrass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization reduced TNC concentrations across defoliation treatments.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
TNC concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization reduced TNC concentrations for all defoliation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TNC remained lower after 3, 6, and 9 weeks with 120 versus 0 kg N ha−1.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Organ / stage
recovery growthe0
Treatment
120e0
Outcome
TNC concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
0 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulated TNC concentrations remained lower after 3, 6, and 9 wk of recovery growth for 120 compared with 0 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By mid-October, TNC concentrations differed little among defoliation treatments.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Treatment
defoliation treatmentse0
Outcome
TNC concentrationse0
Direction
little differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relatively little difference was observed among defoliation treatments in TNC concentrations by mid‐October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe spring defoliation generally lowered TNC during recovery compared with moderate defoliation.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Treatment
Severe defoliatione0
Outcome
TNC concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
moderate defoliatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Severe defoliation at early, mid, and late spring generally contributed to lower TNC concentrations during recovery growth compared with moderate defoliation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TNC was relatively high up to 6 to 8 weeks after spring defoliation for most treatments.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
TNC concentrationse0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
6 to 8 wk or lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TNC concentrations 6 to 8 wk or less after spring defoliation were at a relatively high concentration for most defoliation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-July herbage use should not seriously weaken switchgrass stands.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
herbage utilization in mid‐ to late‐Julye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbage utilization in mid‐ to late‐July should not seriously weaken stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TNC concentrations were lower in mid-October 1985 than in 1984.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
TNC concentrationse0
Direction
Lowere0
Comparator
1984e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum virgatum
Panicum virgatum · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower TNC concentrations in mid‐October of 1985 compared with 1984”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Panicum virgatum (switchgrass)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.