Paper · 2001 · Weed Research

Cutting weeds with a CO2 laser

T Heisel; J Schou; S Christensen; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
75
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Stems of Chenopodium album . and Sinapis arvensis . and leaves of Lolium perenne . were cut with a CO 2 laser or with a pair of scissors. Treatments were carried out on greenhouse‐grown pot plants at three different growth stages and at two heights. Plant dry matter was measured 2 to 5 weeks after treatment. The relationship between dry weight and laser energy was analysed using a non‐linear dose–response regression model. The regression parameters differed significantly between the weed species. At all growth stages and heights S. arvensis was more difficult to cut with a CO 2 laser than C. album . When stems were cut below the meristems, 0.9 and 2.3 J mm −1 of CO 2 laser energy dose was sufficient to reduce by 90% the biomass of C. album and S. arvensis respectively. Regrowth appeared when dicotyledonous plant stems were cut above meristems, indicating that it is important to cut close to the soil surface to obtain a significant effect. When cutting L. perenne plants with 2‐true leaves at a height of 2 cm from the soil surface with a laser, the biomass decreased significantly compared with plants cut by scissors, indicating a delay in regrowth. This delay was not observed for the dicotyledonous plants nor for the other growth stages of L. perenne .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dose response regression parameters differed by weed species.

Taxon
weed speciese0
Outcome
regression parameterse0
Direction
differede0

Verbatim

e0

“The regression parameters differed significantly between the weed species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. arvensis was more difficult to cut than C. album at every stage and height.

Taxon
S. arvensisMutarda arvensise0
Treatment
CO 2 lasere0
Outcome
more difficult to cute0
Direction
more difficulte0
Comparator
C. albume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mutarda arvensis
Mutarda arvensis · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. TeunSpaans assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At all growth stages and heights S. arvensis was more difficult to cut with a CO 2 laser than C. album”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 0.9 J mm −1 laser dose cut C. album biomass by 90% below the meristems.

Taxon
C. albumChenopodium albume0
Treatment
CO 2 laser energy dosee0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
below the meristemse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When stems were cut below the meristems, 0.9 and 2.3 J mm −1 of CO 2 laser energy dose was sufficient to reduce by 90% the biomass of C. album and S. arvensis respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2.3 J mm −1 laser dose cut S. arvensis biomass by 90% below the meristems.

Taxon
S. arvensisMutarda arvensise0
Treatment
2.3 J mm −1 of CO 2 laser energy dosee0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
below the meristemse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mutarda arvensis
Mutarda arvensis · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. TeunSpaans assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When stems were cut below the meristems, 0.9 and 2.3 J mm −1 of CO 2 laser energy dose was sufficient to reduce by 90% the biomass of C. album and S. arvensis respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–778 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicot stems regrew when cut above meristems.

Taxon
dicotyledonous plante0
Treatment
cut above meristemse0
Outcome
Regrowth appearede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Regrowth appeared when dicotyledonous plant stems were cut above meristems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Laser cutting L. perenne at the two-leaf stage and 2 cm height reduced biomass relative to scissors.

Taxon
L. perenneLolium perennee0
Organ / stage
2‐true leavese0
Treatment
lasere0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
2 cm from the soil surfacee0
Comparator
plants cut by scissorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When cutting L. perenne plants with 2‐true leaves at a height of 2 cm from the soil surface with a laser, the biomass decreased significantly compared with plants cut by scissors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The regrowth delay did not occur in dicotyledonous plants.

Taxon
dicotyledonous plantse0
Outcome
delaye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“This delay was not observed for the dicotyledonous plants nor for the other growth stages of L. perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The regrowth delay did not occur at other L. perenne growth stages.

Taxon
L. perenneLolium perennee0
Organ / stage
other growth stagese0
Outcome
delaye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This delay was not observed for the dicotyledonous plants nor for the other growth stages of L. perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1268 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Chenopodium album (common lambsquarters)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.