Paper · 1988 · Agronomy Journal

Response of Kernel Weight of Sorghum to Environment Early and Late in Grain Filling

J. R. Kiniry; R. L. Musser

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is grown in a wide range of moisture and temperature environments because it is drought and heat resistant and has a relatively high yield potential. Describing the influence of reduced photosynthesis and increased temperature during grain filling on mean kernel weight (KWT) is a prerequisite to understanding the control of productivity in sorghum. Objectives of this study were to determine if decreased available assimilate due to reduced photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) during early grain filling reduces KWT by reducing the number of endosperm cells, and to investigate the effect of temperature on KWT and number of starch granules after endosperm cell division is complete. Plants of a single‐seeded hybrid (Hl) and a twin‐seeded hybrid (H2) were grown until heading in a greenhouse. From heading until 10 to 12 d after anthesis, plants were in growth chambers with PPFD of either 300 or 595 μ mol m −2 s −1 . Thereafter, plants were in chambers at 15, 22.5 or 30 °C until maturity. Measurements included seed volume and number of endosperm cells at the end of the PPFD treatments, and number of starch granules and KWT after maturity. Low PPFD early in grain filling did not decrease KWT of either hybrid although it reduced number of endosperm cells of H1 by 47%. The 30 °C treatment reduced KWT by 29% for both hybrids relative to the 22.5 °C treatment. Likewise, the 30 °C temperature reduced number of starch granules at maturity, It appeared that reduced production of starch granules contributed directly to reduced KWT at 30 °C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low photon flux early in grain filling did not decrease kernel weight in either hybrid.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Low PPFDe0
Outcome
KWTe0
Direction
did not decreasee0
Qualifier
early in grain fillinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low PPFD early in grain filling did not decrease KWT of either hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low photon flux reduced H1 endosperm cell number by 47%.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
H1e0
Outcome
number of endosperm cellse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
47%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it reduced number of endosperm cells of H1 by 47%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 30 °C treatment reduced kernel weight by 29% in both hybrids relative to 22.5 °C.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
30 °C treatmente0
Outcome
KWTe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
22.5 °C treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 30 °C treatment reduced KWT by 29% for both hybrids relative to the 22.5 °C treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 30 °C treatment reduced starch granule numbers at maturity.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Organ / stage
maturitye0
Treatment
30 °C temperaturee0
Outcome
number of starch granulese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 30 °C temperature reduced number of starch granules at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret lower starch granule production as contributing to reduced kernel weight at 30 °C.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
30 °Ce0
Outcome
reduced KWTe0
Qualifier
reduced production of starch granulese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced production of starch granules contributed directly to reduced KWT at 30 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑

light · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.