Paper · 1990 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Rooting depth of wheat in the Victorian Mallee

M Incerti; GJ O'Leary

15
claims
24
verbatim quotes
60
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In 1986 and 1987 wheat was sown in an experiment at the Mallee Research Station, Walpeup, at 2 times of sowing and with 3 rates of applied nitrogen. Soil cores were taken and trenches excavated to 1.5 m to measure wheat root growth and depth of rooting. Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm. The application of nitrogen fertiliser did not affect either the rooting depth or growth and yield. Significant changes in total soil water content between sowing and harvest only occurred in 1987 with the early and late sown crops reducing the total soil water content by 47 and 99 mm respectively. In 1986, above average rainfall during the growing season caused the early sown crop to accumulate more water below 50 cm than the late sown crop. While total water use was increased only in 1986 with early sowing, crop water use efficiency and yield was greater in both years. The addition of nitrogen had no effect on crop water use or water use efficiency. A survey of wheat crops carried out in 1988 on 10 Mallee farms also found that shallow rooting is widespead. The field experiment and survey data show that, irrespective of sowing time, roots did not penetrate as far down the profile as might be expected, given reported rooting depths commonly in excess of 200 cm on similarly textured soils. This was shown to be associated with high soil pH and salt content. Poor rooting depth of wheat in this environment will restrict the use of stored water and accordingly, calls the practice of fallowing into question.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
crops sown in Maye0
Outcome
maximum depthe0
Value
104 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing reduced total wheat root biomass compared with crops sown in May.

Treatment
delayed sowinge0
Outcome
total root biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
crops sown in Maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing limited wheat rooting depth to 73-83 cm compared with crops sown in May.

Treatment
delayed sowinge0
Outcome
rooting depthe0
Direction
limitede0
Value
73-83 cme0
Comparator
crops sown in Maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertiliser application did not affect wheat rooting depth.

Treatment
application of nitrogen fertilisere1
Outcome
rooting depthe1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of nitrogen fertiliser did not affect either the rooting depth or growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertiliser application did not affect wheat growth and yield.

Treatment
application of nitrogen fertilisere1
Outcome
growth and yielde1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of nitrogen fertiliser did not affect either the rooting depth or growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early and late sowing reduced total soil water content by 47 and 99 mm, respectively, and this occurred only in 1987.

Treatment
early and late sown cropse2
Outcome
total soil water contente2
Direction
reducinge2
Value
47 and 99 mme2
Qualifier
only occurred in 1987e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significant changes in total soil water content between sowing and harvest only occurred in 1987 with the early and late sown crops reducing the total soil water content by 47 and 99 mm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1986 the early-sown crop accumulated more water below 50 cm than the late-sown crop.

Treatment
early sown crope3
Outcome
water below 50 cme3
Direction
accumulate moree3
Qualifier
In 1986e3
Comparator
late sown crope3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1986, above average rainfall during the growing season caused the early sown crop to accumulate more water below 50 cm than the late sown crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing increased total water use, but only in 1986.

Treatment
early sowinge4
Outcome
total water usee4
Direction
was increasede4
Qualifier
only in 1986e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
e4

“While total water use was increased only in 1986 with early sowing, crop water use efficiency and yield was greater in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing increased crop water use efficiency and yield in both years.

Treatment
early sowinge4
Outcome
crop water use efficiency and yielde4
Direction
was greatere4
Qualifier
in both yearse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
e4

“While total water use was increased only in 1986 with early sowing, crop water use efficiency and yield was greater in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen addition had no effect on crop water use or water use efficiency.

Treatment
addition of nitrogene5
Outcome
crop water use or water use efficiencye5
Direction
had no effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
e5

“The addition of nitrogen had no effect on crop water use or water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1988 survey of wheat crops on 10 Mallee farms found shallow rooting to be widespread.

Taxon
wheat cropsTriticum aestivume6
Outcome
shallow rootinge6
Setting
Mallee farmse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“A survey of wheat crops carried out in 1988 on 10 Mallee farms also found that shallow rooting is widespead”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1228 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots did not penetrate as far down the profile as expected from reported rooting depths commonly in excess of 200 cm on similarly textured soils, irrespective of sowing time.

Outcome
rooting depthe7
Qualifier
commonly in excess of 200 cm on similarly textured soilse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
e7

“The field experiment and survey data show that, irrespective of sowing time, roots did not penetrate as far down the profile as might be expected, given reported rooting depths commonly in excess of 200 cm on similarly textured soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1463 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow wheat rooting was associated with high soil pH and salt content.

Treatment
high soil pH and salt contente1
Outcome
rooting depthe0
Direction
associatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat roots penetrated to a maximum depth of 104 cm in crops sown in May, the optimum time of sowing for maximum yield, while delayed sowing reduced total root biomass and limited rooting depth to 73-83 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“This was shown to be associated with high soil pH and salt content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1531 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Poor rooting depth of wheat is suggested to restrict the use of stored water.

Outcome
use of stored watere0
Qualifier
Poor rooting depthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poor rooting depth of wheat in this environment will restrict the use of stored water and accordingly, calls the practice of fallowing into question”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1681 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call the practice of fallowing into question for wheat in this environment.

Outcome
practice of fallowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poor rooting depth of wheat in this environment will restrict the use of stored water and accordingly, calls the practice of fallowing into question”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1681 · show in text ↑

sowing time · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 88 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

sowing time · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 65 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 663 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.