Paper · 2006 · Weed Biology and Management

Reduced rates of tank mixtures for red sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis[L.] Nees) and greater club‐rush (Scirpus grossus [L.] f.) control in rice

TSE‐SENG CHUAH; BINTI MOHAMAD MAZIAH; BINTI MOHAMAD YUSUF NURAZIAH; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study on the efficacy of tank‐mix combinations on the growth of Leptochloa chinensis (L.) Nees and Scirpus grossus (L.) f. at the 3–4‐leaf stage was conducted under glasshouse conditions. Sethoxydim plus cyhalofop‐butyl at 8 + 25, 16 + 25, 32 + 25, 32 + 12.5, and 32 + 6.25 g ai ha −1 provided good control of L. chinensis , ranging from 89–95%. However, a comparison of the costs of herbicide mixtures revealed that sethoxydim at 32 g ai ha −1 plus cyhalofop‐butyl at 6.25 g ai ha −1 were the most cost‐effective among the combinations. For Scirpus grossus , bensulfuron plus 2,4‐D dimethylamine at 2.5 + 18, 5.0 + 18, 1.25 + 36, 2.5 + 36, and 5.0 + 36 g ai ha −1 gave good control that ranged from 88–93%. Tank‐mixing bensulfuron with 2,4‐D at 1.25 + 36 g ai ha −1 was, however, the most cost‐effective mixture compared to the other mixtures. None of the tank mixtures tested in this study caused injury to the rice seedlings. However, further field studies need to be undertaken to verify these findings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sethoxydim plus cyhalofop-butyl mixtures gave good control of L. chinensis (89–95%)

Treatment
Sethoxydim plus cyhalofop‐butyle1
Interactor
L. chinensisDinebra chinensise1weed
Outcome
control of L. chinensise1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
89–95%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Dinebra chinensis
Dinebra chinensis · InteractorPing an Chang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reduced rates of tank mixtures for red sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis[L.] Nees) and greater club‐rush (Scirpus grossus [L.] f.) control in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sethoxydim plus cyhalofop‐butyl at 8 + 25, 16 + 25, 32 + 25, 32 + 12.5, and 32 + 6.25 g ai ha −1 provided good control of L. chinensis , ranging from 89–95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bensulfuron plus 2,4-D dimethylamine gave good control of Scirpus grossus (88–93%)

Treatment
bensulfuron plus 2,4‐D dimethylaminee2
Interactor
Scirpus grossusActinoscirpus grossuse2weed
Outcome
controle2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
88–93%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Actinoscirpus grossus
Actinoscirpus grossus · InteractorWibowo Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reduced rates of tank mixtures for red sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis[L.] Nees) and greater club‐rush (Scirpus grossus [L.] f.) control in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“For Scirpus grossus , bensulfuron plus 2,4‐D dimethylamine at 2.5 + 18, 5.0 + 18, 1.25 + 36, 2.5 + 36, and 5.0 + 36 g ai ha −1 gave good control that ranged from 88–93%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank-mixing bensulfuron with 2,4-D at 1.25 + 36 g ai ha-1 was the most cost-effective mixture compared with the other mixtures

Treatment
Tank‐mixing bensulfuron with 2,4‐De3
Outcome
cost‐effectivee3
Direction
most cost‐effectivee3
Comparator
the other mixturese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reduced rates of tank mixtures for red sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis[L.] Nees) and greater club‐rush (Scirpus grossus [L.] f.) control in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“Tank‐mixing bensulfuron with 2,4‐D at 1.25 + 36 g ai ha −1 was, however, the most cost‐effective mixture compared to the other mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sethoxydim at 32 g ai ha-1 plus cyhalofop-butyl at 6.25 g ai ha-1 were the most cost-effective among the herbicide mixtures compared

Treatment
sethoxydim at 32 g ai ha −1 plus cyhalofop‐butyl at 6.25 g ai ha −1e4
Outcome
cost‐effectivee4
Direction
most cost‐effectivee4
Comparator
the combinationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reduced rates of tank mixtures for red sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis[L.] Nees) and greater club‐rush (Scirpus grossus [L.] f.) control in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
e4

“a comparison of the costs of herbicide mixtures revealed that sethoxydim at 32 g ai ha −1 plus cyhalofop‐butyl at 6.25 g ai ha −1 were the most cost‐effective among the combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the tank mixtures caused injury to rice seedlings

Organ / stage
rice seedlingse5
Treatment
tank mixturese5
Outcome
injurye5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reduced rates of tank mixtures for red sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis[L.] Nees) and greater club‐rush (Scirpus grossus [L.] f.) control in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
e5

“None of the tank mixtures tested in this study caused injury to the rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–929 · show in text ↑

Cyhalofop-butyl · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 52 positive, 10 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Cyhalofop-butyl · Dinebra chinensis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

bensulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.