Paper · 1992 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Aluminum Effects on Calcium Fluxes at the Root Apex of Aluminum-Tolerant and Aluminum-Sensitive Wheat Cultivars

Jianwei W. Huang; Jon E. Shaff; David L. Grunes; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
198
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The role of Ca(2+) transport in the mechanism of Al toxicity was investigated, using a Ca(2+)-selective microelectrode system to study Al effects on root apical Ca(2+) fluxes in two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars: Al-tolerant Atlas 66 and Al-sensitive Scout 66. Intact 3-day-old low-salt-grown (100 micromolar CaCl(2), pH 4.5) wheat seedlings were used, and it was found that both cultivars maintained similar rates of net Ca(2+) uptake in the absence of Al. Addition of Al concentrations that were toxic to Scout (5-20 micromolar AlCl(3)) immediately and dramatically inhibited Ca(2+) uptake in Scout, whereas Ca(2+) transport in Atlas was relatively unaffected. The Al-induced inhibition of Ca(2+) uptake in Scout 66 was rapidly reversed following removal of Al from the solution bathing the roots. Similar studies with morphologically intact root cell wall preparations indicated that the Al effects did not involve Al-Ca interactions in the cell wall. These results suggest that Al inhibits Ca(2+) influx across the root plasmalemma, possibly via blockage of calcium channels. The differential effect of Al on Ca(2+) transport in Al-sensitive Scout and Al-tolerant Atlas suggests that Al blockage of Ca(2+) channels could play a role in the cellular mechanism of Al toxicity in higher plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two wheat cultivars had similar net calcium uptake without aluminum.

Outcome
net Ca(2+) uptakee0
Qualifier
in the absence of Ale0
Comparator
both cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both cultivars maintained similar rates of net Ca(2+) uptake in the absence of Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxic aluminum concentrations immediately and dramatically inhibited calcium uptake in Scout.

Material
Scoute0
Treatment
5-20 micromolar AlCl(3)e0
Outcome
Ca(2+) uptakee0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of Al concentrations that were toxic to Scout (5-20 micromolar AlCl(3)) immediately and dramatically inhibited Ca(2+) uptake in Scout”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium transport in Atlas was relatively unaffected by the aluminum concentrations.

Material
Atlase0
Treatment
5-20 micromolar AlCl(3)e1
Outcome
Ca(2+) transporte0
Direction
relatively unaffectede0
Comparator
Scoute1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas Ca(2+) transport in Atlas was relatively unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–671 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of Al concentrations that were toxic to Scout (5-20 micromolar AlCl(3))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing aluminum rapidly reversed its inhibition of calcium uptake in Scout 66.

Material
Scout 66e0
Treatment
removal of Ale0
Outcome
Ca(2+) uptakee0
Direction
reversede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Al-induced inhibition of Ca(2+) uptake in Scout 66 was rapidly reversed following removal of Al from the solution bathing the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum effects did not involve aluminum-calcium interactions in root cell walls.

Organ / stage
root cell walle0
Outcome
did not involve Al-Ca interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar studies with morphologically intact root cell wall preparations indicated that the Al effects did not involve Al-Ca interactions in the cell wall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest aluminum inhibits calcium influx across the root plasmalemma, possibly by blocking calcium channels.

Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
Ca(2+) influx across the root plasmalemmae0
Direction
inhibitse0
Qualifier
possibly via blockage of calcium channelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that Al inhibits Ca(2+) influx across the root plasmalemma, possibly via blockage of calcium channels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The differential calcium transport response suggests calcium channel blockage could contribute to aluminum toxicity.

Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
cellular mechanism of Al toxicitye0
Qualifier
Al blockage of Ca(2+) channelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differential effect of Al on Ca(2+) transport in Al-sensitive Scout and Al-tolerant Atlas suggests that Al blockage of Ca(2+) channels could play a role in the cellular mechanism of Al toxicity in higher plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 5 positive, 27 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

aluminium trichloride · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.