Paper · 1980 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Phytochrome Responses to End-of-Day Irradiations in Light-grown Corn Grown in the Presence and Absence of Sandoz 9789

Holly L. Gorton; Winslow R. Briggs

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Corn seedlings were grown in white light in the absence and presence of the chlorosis-inducing herbicide San 9789. The resulting green and achlorophyllous seedlings were used to investigate phytochrome-mediated responses to end-of-day far red irradiation and reversal of these responses by subsequent red irradiation. Mesocotyl and coleoptile elongation increased in response to end-of-day far red irradiation, whereas the anthocyanin content of the coleoptiles was decreased. All three responses were reversible by red irradiation following the far red. Dose-response curves for far red induction and red reversal of these responses did not differ significantly for plants grown in the presence or absence of San 9789. Thus, San 9789 appears to affect neither phytochrome itself nor the response system involved. Chlorophyll screening likewise does not affect phytochrome relationships for these responses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

End-of-day far-red irradiation increased corn mesocotyl elongation.

Taxon
Corn seedlingsZea mays subsp. mayse1
Organ / stage
Mesocotyle0
Treatment
end-of-day far red irradiatione0
Outcome
Mesocotyl and coleoptile elongatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mesocotyl and coleoptile elongation increased in response to end-of-day far red irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn seedlings were grown in white light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

End-of-day far-red irradiation increased corn coleoptile elongation.

Organ / stage
coleoptilee0
Treatment
end-of-day far red irradiatione0
Outcome
coleoptile elongatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mesocotyl and coleoptile elongation increased in response to end-of-day far red irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

End-of-day far-red irradiation decreased anthocyanin content of corn coleoptiles.

Organ / stage
coleoptilese0
Treatment
end-of-day far red irradiatione1
Outcome
anthocyanin content of the coleoptilese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the anthocyanin content of the coleoptiles was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–475 · show in text ↑
e1

“responses to end-of-day far red irradiation and reversal of these responses by subsequent red irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsequent red irradiation reversed all three far-red responses in corn seedlings.

Treatment
red irradiation following the far rede0
Outcome
All three responses were reversiblee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three responses were reversible by red irradiation following the far red.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Far-red induction and red reversal dose-response curves did not differ significantly between corn plants grown with or without San 9789.

Treatment
presence or absence of San 9789e0
Outcome
Dose-response curves for far red induction and red reversale0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
absence of San 9789e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dose-response curves for far red induction and red reversal of these responses did not differ significantly for plants grown in the presence or absence of San 9789.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that San 9789 does not affect phytochrome or the response system in corn.

Treatment
San 9789e0
Outcome
phytochrome itself nor the response systeme0
Direction
neithere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“San 9789 appears to affect neither phytochrome itself nor the response system involved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll screening was inferred not to affect corn phytochrome relationships for these responses.

Outcome
phytochrome relationships for these responsese0
Direction
does not affecte0
Qualifier
Chlorophyll screeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll screening likewise does not affect phytochrome relationships for these responses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

radiation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 20 positive, 10 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.