Paper · 2004 · Ecology

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ABSCISIC-ACID-MEDIATED RESPONSES AND PLANT RESISTANCE TO PATHOGENS AND INSECTS

Jennifer S. Thaler; Richard M. Bostock

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
290
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One goal of phytohormonal ecology is to study the interactions between biotic and abiotic stress at hierarchical levels of biological organization. From an ecological perspective, exposure to one stress may alter the plant's probability of being exposed to another stress. From a mechanistic perspective, hormonal and biochemical signaling interactions between responses to each stress may influence the severity or ability to adaptively respond to the subsequent stress. In this article, we consider the relationship between plant water and salt stress and attack by pathogens and herbivores. Empirical data suggest that water stress and the probability of attack by pathogens and herbivores are correlated between habitats. Biochemical interactions between plant responses to water and salt stress and insect and pathogen attack are also interrelated. Initial biochemical models indicated that abscisic acid (ABA), an important hormone in responses to water and salt stress, had a synergistic positive role with jasmonate-induced defenses against herbivores and an antagonistic role with salicylate-based resistance to some pathogens. Based on this background, we developed predictions about how water and salt stress would alter plant resistance to insects and pathogens and tested the predictions using tomato plants as a model system. We used polyphenol oxidase activity as a marker of the jasmonate response and pathogenesis-related protein P4 as a marker of the salicylate response. First, we examined levels of chemical defense in wild-type and ABA-deficient plants and the ability of these plants to resist insect and pathogen attack. In the second experiment, we exposed plants to short-term salinity stress and tested their subsequent resistance to a chewing insect Spodoptera exigua and the bacterial speck pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. We have two key findings. First, ABA-deficient plants had higher levels of salicylate-mediated responses and were more resistant to bacterial speck disease, consistent with the proposed role of salicylate in defense against pathogens. This suggests linkage between water availability to the plant and salicylate action in pathogenesis through ABA signaling. ABA-deficient plants had reduced resistance to the insect Spodoptera exigua, suggesting a positive correlation between responses to water stress and herbivory. The lack of difference in chemical expression of the jasmonate (JA) response (polyphenol oxidase activity) between wild-type and ABA-deficient plants did not support the proposed mechanism of synergism with the jasmonate response. Second, salt stress reduced the chemical induction (e.g., pathogenesis-related protein P4) of the salicylate response, but this did not affect resistance to the pathogen. Salt stress did not alter resistance to the herbivore Trichoplusia ni, but did alter the negative signal interaction between the jasmonate and salicylate responses. Under control conditions, the jasmonate and salicylate responses are antagonistic to one another, with induction of one response reducing the inducibility of the other. Under salt stress conditions, the negative effect of salicylate on the jasmonate response was reduced. Thus, complex interactions occur between ABA, JA, and SA, hormones that are important regulators of abiotic and biotic stress responses. Phytohormonal ecology is attempting to link ecological and hormonal interactions to develop a predictive framework for how and why plants coordinate responses to the environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA-deficient plants had higher salicylate-mediated responses.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Material
ABA-deficient plantse0
Outcome
salicylate-mediated responsese0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA-deficient plants had higher levels of salicylate-mediated responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1894–1965 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants as a model system. We used polyphenol oxidase activity as a marker of the jasmonate response and pathogenesis-related protein P4 as a marker of the salicylate response. First, we examined levels of chemical defense in wild-type and ABA-deficient plants and the ability of these plants to resist insect and pathogen attack. In the second experiment, we exposed plants to short-term salinity stress and tested their subsequent resistance to a chewing insect Spodoptera exigua and the bacterial speck pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1860 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA-deficient plants resisted bacterial speck disease more strongly.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Material
ABA-deficient plantse0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoPseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoe1pathogene0
Outcome
bacterial speck diseasee0
Direction
more resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA-deficient plants had higher levels of salicylate-mediated responses and were more resistant to bacterial speck disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1894–2016 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants as a model system. We used polyphenol oxidase activity as a marker of the jasmonate response and pathogenesis-related protein P4 as a marker of the salicylate response. First, we examined levels of chemical defense in wild-type and ABA-deficient plants and the ability of these plants to resist insect and pathogen attack. In the second experiment, we exposed plants to short-term salinity stress and tested their subsequent resistance to a chewing insect Spodoptera exigua and the bacterial speck pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1860 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA-deficient plants had reduced resistance to Spodoptera exigua.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Material
ABA-deficient plantse0
Interactor
Spodoptera exiguaSpodoptera exiguae0herbivore
Outcome
resistance to the insect Spodoptera exiguae0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera exigua
Spodoptera exigua · InteractorDumi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA-deficient plants had reduced resistance to the insect Spodoptera exigua”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2219–2294 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants as a model system. We used polyphenol oxidase activity as a marker of the jasmonate response and pathogenesis-related protein P4 as a marker of the salicylate response. First, we examined levels of chemical defense in wild-type and ABA-deficient plants and the ability of these plants to resist insect and pathogen attack. In the second experiment, we exposed plants to short-term salinity stress and tested their subsequent resistance to a chewing insect Spodoptera exigua and the bacterial speck pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1860 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyphenol oxidase activity did not differ between wild type and ABA-deficient plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Material
ABA-deficient plantse0
Gene
polyphenol oxidasee0
Outcome
polyphenol oxidase activitye0
Direction
lack of differencee0
Comparator
wild-typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lack of difference in chemical expression of the jasmonate (JA) response (polyphenol oxidase activity) between wild-type and ABA-deficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2379–2528 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants as a model system. We used polyphenol oxidase activity as a marker of the jasmonate response and pathogenesis-related protein P4 as a marker of the salicylate response. First, we examined levels of chemical defense in wild-type and ABA-deficient plants and the ability of these plants to resist insect and pathogen attack. In the second experiment, we exposed plants to short-term salinity stress and tested their subsequent resistance to a chewing insect Spodoptera exigua and the bacterial speck pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced induction of pathogenesis-related protein P4.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
salt stresse0
Gene
pathogenesis-related protein P4e0
Outcome
chemical induction (e.g., pathogenesis-related protein P4) of the salicylate responsee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salt stress reduced the chemical induction (e.g., pathogenesis-related protein P4) of the salicylate response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2618–2727 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants as a model system. We used polyphenol oxidase activity as a marker of the jasmonate response and pathogenesis-related protein P4 as a marker of the salicylate response. First, we examined levels of chemical defense in wild-type and ABA-deficient plants and the ability of these plants to resist insect and pathogen attack. In the second experiment, we exposed plants to short-term salinity stress and tested their subsequent resistance to a chewing insect Spodoptera exigua and the bacterial speck pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress did not affect resistance to the pathogen.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
salt stresse0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoPseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoe1pathogene0
Outcome
resistance to the pathogene0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salt stress reduced the chemical induction (e.g., pathogenesis-related protein P4) of the salicylate response, but this did not affect resistance to the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2618–2779 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants as a model system. We used polyphenol oxidase activity as a marker of the jasmonate response and pathogenesis-related protein P4 as a marker of the salicylate response. First, we examined levels of chemical defense in wild-type and ABA-deficient plants and the ability of these plants to resist insect and pathogen attack. In the second experiment, we exposed plants to short-term salinity stress and tested their subsequent resistance to a chewing insect Spodoptera exigua and the bacterial speck pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress did not alter resistance to Trichoplusia ni.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Interactor
Trichoplusia niTrichoplusia nie0herbivore
Outcome
resistance to the herbivore Trichoplusia nie0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoplusia ni
Trichoplusia ni · InteractorWhitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress did not alter resistance to the herbivore Trichoplusia ni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2781–2850 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants as a model system. We used polyphenol oxidase activity as a marker of the jasmonate response and pathogenesis-related protein P4 as a marker of the salicylate response. First, we examined levels of chemical defense in wild-type and ABA-deficient plants and the ability of these plants to resist insect and pathogen attack. In the second experiment, we exposed plants to short-term salinity stress and tested their subsequent resistance to a chewing insect Spodoptera exigua and the bacterial speck pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salt stress, salicylate less strongly suppressed the jasmonate response.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
salt stresse0
Compound
salicylatee0
Outcome
negative effect of salicylate on the jasmonate responsee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under salt stress conditions, the negative effect of salicylate on the jasmonate response was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3115–3217 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants as a model system. We used polyphenol oxidase activity as a marker of the jasmonate response and pathogenesis-related protein P4 as a marker of the salicylate response. First, we examined levels of chemical defense in wild-type and ABA-deficient plants and the ability of these plants to resist insect and pathogen attack. In the second experiment, we exposed plants to short-term salinity stress and tested their subsequent resistance to a chewing insect Spodoptera exigua and the bacterial speck pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1860 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: protein · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

14 papers: 1 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

salinity · Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.