Paper · 2013 · QScience Connect

Evaluation of cultural control practices in the management of sweetpotato weevil (Cylas puncticollis) Boheman (Colepotera: Curculionidae)

A Mansaray; AJ Sundufu; K Yilla; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The sweetpotato weevil, Cylas puncticollis Boheman, constitutes a major constraint to sweet potato production and utilization in Africa. Host plant resistance/tolerance, mulching and varying harvesting dates could provide an approach that fits well into an integrated pest management programme of this insect pest. In this study, a trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of host plant, mulching with freshly harvested, dried and chopped up aerial parts of elephant grass (Panicum maximum), and the manipulation of harvesting date, on crop damage by the sweetpotato weevil. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete split-split plot design with three replications. Four sweet potato varieties (improved variety- kabbia, slipot 2, slipot 3 and slipot 4), four harvesting dates (90, 104, 118 and 132 days after planting (DAP)) and four mulching levels (0t/ha, 1t/ha, 3t/ha and 5t/ha) were used. Data analysis revealed significant differences in C. puncticollis tuber damage and number of tubers produced with respect to mulching. Cylas puncticollis incidence was observed to decrease with increase in mulching level. Also, significant cultivar variation with respect to C. puncticollis tuber damage and the total number of tubers produced were recorded. Slipot 3 and slipot 4 were observed to be significantly less susceptible to the sweetpotato weevil. Harvesting date was also significantly different, with respect to the number of damaged tubers. More tubers were damaged when harvesting was delayed. Hence, using slipot 3 or slipot 4, coupled with mulching at the rate of 3-5t/ha and harvesting at 104 DAP resulted in increased number of tubers and reduced sweetpotato weevil infestation in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cylas puncticollis incidence decreased as mulching level increased.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
mulching levele1
Interactor
Cylas puncticollisCylas puncticollise1pest
Outcome
Cylas puncticollis incidencee1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sweetpotato weevil, Cylas puncticollis Boheman, constitutes a major constraint to sweet potato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cylas puncticollis incidence was observed to decrease with increase in mulching level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1127 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching gave significant differences in C. puncticollis tuber damage and in the number of tubers produced.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
mulchinge2
Interactor
C. puncticollisCylas puncticollise2pest
Outcome
tuber damage and number of tubers producede2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constitutes a major constraint to sweet potato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–109 · show in text ↑
e2

“Data analysis revealed significant differences in C. puncticollis tuber damage and number of tubers produced with respect to mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1040 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in C. puncticollis tuber damage and in total tuber number.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Material
cultivare3
Interactor
C. puncticollisCylas puncticollise3pest
Outcome
tuber damage and the total number of tubers producede3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constitutes a major constraint to sweet potato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–109 · show in text ↑
e3

“Also, significant cultivar variation with respect to C. puncticollis tuber damage and the total number of tubers produced were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1264 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Slipot 3 and slipot 4 were significantly less susceptible to the sweetpotato weevil.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Material
Slipot 3 and slipot 4e4
Interactor
sweetpotato weevilCylas formicariuse4pest
Outcome
susceptible to the sweetpotato weevile4
Direction
lesse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cylas formicarius
Cylas formicarius · InteractorCaroline Harding, MAF · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constitutes a major constraint to sweet potato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–109 · show in text ↑
e4

“Slipot 3 and slipot 4 were observed to be significantly less susceptible to the sweetpotato weevil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1364 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting date differed significantly in the number of damaged tubers.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Harvesting datee5
Outcome
number of damaged tuberse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constitutes a major constraint to sweet potato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–109 · show in text ↑
e5

“Harvesting date was also significantly different, with respect to the number of damaged tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More tubers were damaged when harvesting was delayed.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
harvesting was delayede6
Outcome
tubers were damagede6
Direction
Moree6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constitutes a major constraint to sweet potato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–109 · show in text ↑
e6

“More tubers were damaged when harvesting was delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slipot 3 or slipot 4 with mulching at 3-5 t/ha and harvesting at 104 DAP increased the number of tubers.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Material
slipot 3 or slipot 4e7
Treatment
coupled with mulching at the rate of 3-5t/ha and harvesting at 104 DAPe7
Outcome
number of tuberse7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constitutes a major constraint to sweet potato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–109 · show in text ↑
e7

“using slipot 3 or slipot 4, coupled with mulching at the rate of 3-5t/ha and harvesting at 104 DAP resulted in increased number of tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slipot 3 or slipot 4 with mulching at 3-5 t/ha and harvesting at 104 DAP reduced sweetpotato weevil infestation in the field.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
coupled with mulching at the rate of 3-5t/ha and harvesting at 104 DAPe7
Interactor
sweetpotato weevilCylas formicariuse1pest
Outcome
sweetpotato weevil infestatione1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
in the fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cylas formicarius
Cylas formicarius · InteractorCaroline Harding, MAF · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constitutes a major constraint to sweet potato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–109 · show in text ↑
e7

“using slipot 3 or slipot 4, coupled with mulching at the rate of 3-5t/ha and harvesting at 104 DAP resulted in increased number of tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“and reduced sweetpotato weevil infestation in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1716 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

mulching · Cylas formicarius · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.